marknorton Posted August 7, 2007 Share #21 Posted August 7, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) £1000 for an R-D1; the paint has worn off mine, so I doubt it's worth anything like that. As for the D100, £100?, Digilux 2 maybe more, but of course it has been anatomised which will reduce its value. For testing lenses, I've taken to using a piece of graph paper with a big thin cross marked on it. Allows very simple evaluation of focus compared to messing about with measuring tapes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 7, 2007 Posted August 7, 2007 Hi marknorton, Take a look here My 50 'lux arrived today to complete the lineup!. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
innerimager Posted August 7, 2007 Share #22 Posted August 7, 2007 Congratulations Jono, I'm sure you will love the 50 lux. But....complete? Still no 24 elmarit, and on general principals, I'm not buying it!! ;>) best....Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 7, 2007 Author Share #23 Posted August 7, 2007 £1000 for an R-D1; the paint has worn off mine, so I doubt it's worth anything like that. As for the D100, £100?, Digilux 2 maybe more, but of course it has been anatomised which will reduce its value. For testing lenses, I've taken to using a piece of graph paper with a big thin cross marked on it. Allows very simple evaluation of focus compared to messing about with measuring tapes. Hi Mark Having been a rather fickle camera user (E10 - D1x - D100 - E1 - Kodak 14n - D2x - D200 - E 330 - R-D1 - E510 - and those are only the ones I can remember and don't include the plethora of useless compacts) My only redeeming feature is that I've moved them on before they became worthless! Right now I have the two M8's, an Olympus E1 (which I won't sell) an E510, and some Olympus lenses (sometimes you need an slr). I also have a Ricoh Gx100, which I've had for only a month and which is definitely going (fine, but I can't live without an optical viewfinder). I like the graph paper idea, I'll give it a go. Bitter experience tells me that it's important to check it properly before sending off the passport. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 7, 2007 Author Share #24 Posted August 7, 2007 Hi Peter Congratulations Jono, I'm sure you will love the 50 lux. But....complete? Still no 24 elmarit, and on general principals, I'm not buying it!! ;>) best....Peter erm yes - "takes one to know one". You're right, I do want a 24, and will probably get one at some stage, but it MUST be silver - and that makes it a little more tricky (not many of them about). I missed one on ebay for £750 (oh nooooo! fiddle assing about), but I guess another one will appear some day! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted August 7, 2007 Share #25 Posted August 7, 2007 I missed a chrome first version Tri-Elmar last year, one I think of only 500 made. Seems clear, if you like chrome lenses you need to do it now because the range available is not expanding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted August 7, 2007 Share #26 Posted August 7, 2007 I'm rather partial to silver lenses on a black body. Hah, I've always thought that would be a combination which wouldn't work - black on chrome, black on black, chrome on chrome but chrome on black. Certainly unusual. Because I'm chicken, all my lenses are black... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 7, 2007 Author Share #27 Posted August 7, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hah, I've always thought that would be a combination which wouldn't work - black on chrome, black on black, chrome on chrome but chrome on black. Certainly unusual. Because I'm chicken, all my lenses are black... Eat your heart out: I think the chrome lenses are less prone to marking (or it's less visible anyway) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
c6gowin Posted August 7, 2007 Share #28 Posted August 7, 2007 The chrome does look good on the black body. I never even considered getting chrome. I will next time though. Mark Gowin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artichoke Posted August 8, 2007 Share #29 Posted August 8, 2007 I once said we agree more often than disagree I got my chrome 50 Summilux last week & have been busy giving it a work out it is a very sweet lens hope you are having as much fun putting yours through the paces as I am with mine btw, which lens hood are you using with yours? ...I have been using the built in one, which looks inadequate with a filter attached, but so far I have not had any problems with contrast or flare Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 8, 2007 Author Share #30 Posted August 8, 2007 I once said we agree more often than disagreeI got my chrome 50 Summilux last week & have been busy giving it a work out it is a very sweet lens hope you are having as much fun putting yours through the paces as I am with mine btw, which lens hood are you using with yours? ...I have been using the built in one, which looks inadequate with a filter attached, but so far I have not had any problems with contrast or flare HI Arthur I think we agree about pretty much everything these days don't we? I'm pleased with mine, and I'm also using the built in lens hood - too much hassle to do anything else, I've certainly seen no flare problems. It still amazes me how heavy those chrome lenses are - they seem to be heavier than anything that size has a right to be! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted August 8, 2007 Share #31 Posted August 8, 2007 Hi MarkHaving been a rather fickle camera user (E10 - D1x - D100 - E1 - Kodak 14n - D2x - D200 - E 330 - R-D1 - E510 - and those are only the ones I can remember and don't include the plethora of useless compacts) My only redeeming feature is that I've moved them on before they became worthless! Right now I have the two M8's, an Olympus E1 (which I won't sell) an E510, and some Olympus lenses (sometimes you need an slr). I also have a Ricoh Gx100, which I've had for only a month and which is definitely going (fine, but I can't live without an optical viewfinder). I like the graph paper idea, I'll give it a go. Bitter experience tells me that it's important to check it properly before sending off the passport. You could put the 21-28 OVF on the gx100 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 8, 2007 Author Share #32 Posted August 8, 2007 You could put the 21-28 OVF on the gx100 Hi Thomas I could of course . . . . but then it would be nearly as big as an M8! (and nothing like the quality). It's gotta go! (you don't want it do you?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted August 8, 2007 Share #33 Posted August 8, 2007 Hi ThomasI could of course . . . . but then it would be nearly as big as an M8! (and nothing like the quality). It's gotta go! (you don't want it do you?) no, Allready have my own one. The ricoh 21-28 finder isnt really that big. by the way - just got my first chrome lens (Zeiss 50/1.5) and it looks great on theblack M8. The bad thing is that even after resending it to Zeiss for calibrating I have focus issues- so I cant use it. Now I kind of wish my 90macro and 1 or 2 other lenses would be chrome as well - specially the more "classic"looking ones. However weight is an argument for black IMO. cheers, Tom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrewer Posted August 8, 2007 Share #34 Posted August 8, 2007 Great lens. Love mine; wouldn't trade it for anything. Shoot some portraits wide open as soon as you can. They are absolutely awesome. Thanks. Allan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted August 8, 2007 Author Share #35 Posted August 8, 2007 no, Allready have my own one. The ricoh 21-28 finder isnt really that big. by the way - just got my first chrome lens (Zeiss 50/1.5) and it looks great on theblack M8. The bad thing is that even after resending it to Zeiss for calibrating I have focus issues- so I cant use it. Now I kind of wish my 90macro and 1 or 2 other lenses would be chrome as well - specially the more "classic"looking ones. However weight is an argument for black IMO. cheers, Tom Hi Tom But the ricoh finder only does 21-28? Truth to tell, I always have to carry something, and if it has to go over my shoulder it may as well have an M8 in it . . . . Certainly the weight of the silver lenses is startling when you pick them up . . . . . .but adding it up over a bag of lenses it really doesn't amount to much. I have the 50 'cron, the 50 'lux and the 35 'cron in silver - the additional weight in my bag probably amounts to about 1/2 lb - I'm small, weak and old, but I can take it! There is another small point with the Leica lenses that I really haven't seen anyone complaining about focus issues with chrome lenses (in reality it's probably because there are less of them . . . . . ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.