Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Welcome Dimm,

You are definitely the only one who can answer.

I just can tell that I wanted M10 Monochrome (in M-D variety 😪) for long.

Early this year, I had opportunity to buy M246 not too expensive SH and I use it along my first version Monochrome.

Those two MM+M246 complete each other so well that for years to come, I don't want anymore another (...M10 Monochrome when it will be available).

They are much better than my own skill to use them, and I don't want more pixels ( what for ? )

Link to post
Share on other sites

if money is no issue, i suggest you wait if this is your first Leica.

 

i went with MM246, and have M10 first.

 

MM246 is excellent compliment but i feel M10 form factor is more mature and also M10 has Leica Fotos.  For 246, i have to wait till i am near a CARD reader before i can offload and share the photos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first was Q2, after which I fell in love with Leica and started to want to get real rangefinder.

I wanted M10-D first, but I found comparison of high ISO performance and saw that 246 leaves M10 in dust. Since I mostly shoot street photography in B&W brought me to logical decision to get a monochrom

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dimm said:

Since I mostly shoot street photography

Thus far I thnk the MM1 is best for that. The 246 is a more general purpose camera to my mind. It is a bit fatter too. unless I might want to have the possibility to make 30 seconds films in street, I’d go for the rawer MM1

Edited by otto.f
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, otto.f said:

Thus far I thnk the MM1 is best for that. The 246 is a more general purpose camera to my mind. It is a bit fatter too. unless I might want to have the possibility to make 30 seconds films in street, I’d go for the rawer MM1

What about high ISO performance? I saw many comparison shots where 246 clearly performs better than MM1 on high ISO

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dimm said:

What about high ISO performance? I saw many comparison shots where 246 clearly performs better than MM1 on high ISO

Oh, I’m not interested in high ISO’s on an M. Unless for artistic effects. But 3200 is more than enough.

Edited by otto.f
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting topic.  I've thought about the same thing but I doubt I can afford an $8,000+ camera for a while.  I had a bad experience with an M9 so I'm hesitant about getting a MM1 although the price point is in my range and I probably had a bad example.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dimm said:

What was bad in your experience with M9?

It was buggy, meaning unreliable.  I fiddled with SD cards, a new battery, firmware, removing and reinserting the battery, etc. Again, probably a bad example.  I took advantage of the upgrade incentive and got an 240P.  Also, at the time the upgrade to the new sensor was several months and I'm not very patient.  

Edited by RayD28
Link to post
Share on other sites

The question seems to be easy but as you can see, there are many different opinions. I have the Mono I and I am totally happy with it. With higher ISO (up to 3200) the photos got an analog look. So would I buy a new M10 Monochrom? With GAS, yes! From an aesthetic view, maybe. To get better photos? No, never.

If you have a look at your street photos, I am sure that no one will be better with the M10 in comparison to the 246. I use my MMI mostly for portraits and a new Mono would never give my photos a better look  in comparison to the amount of money I had to spend again.

So if you have the money and you love it (what I can understand) take the M10, but you can get the Monochrome feeling also with a 246 without loosing quality. From the money you save, you can buy an additional lens.

Edited by benqui
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, after a few days (or weeks :)) of considerations I decided to go on MM1. 

Looking for a good deal on eBay.

What would you say about this one:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Leica-M-M-Monochrom-ccd-replaced-with-Leica-50mm-24-mm-and-Zeiss-35-mm/113940404716

Camera has CCD replaced and 8k clicks.

Or I could just buy a body with a new CCD and 2k clicks and 35mm Zeiss for $900

https://www.ebay.com/itm/113929387488

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would buy from a reputable dealer with warranty.  Good ones, like Leica Miami, will only sell MMs with the new sensor and paperwork. But that's just me.  The last one you show might be fine, but the limited warranty doc has no info filled in on top...serial, date, etc....and the other doc is for other repair.  $3500 or so is a good price for one that is truly mint....mine looks cleaner, bought from a dealer two years ago.

Jeff

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dimm said:

otto, did you have same experience with the MM1? 

You mean bad experiences that RayDm reported up here? No, I had no bad experiences with my M9 or MM1, except the general sensor problem that we all know of and have been solved. I have my M9 for 10 years now and my MM1 new from the start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jeff S said:

I would buy from a reputable dealer with warranty.  Good ones, like Leica Miami, will only sell MMs with the new sensor and paperwork. But that's just me.  The last one you show might be fine, but the limited warranty doc has no info filled in on top...serial, date, etc....and the other doc is for other repair.  $3500 or so is a good price for one that is truly mint....mine looks cleaner, bought from a dealer two years ago.

Jeff

Right, I wouldn’t buy a digital camera with that sort of prices through eBay. I don’t know about your experience with digital M’s dimm, but a simple thing as dust on the sensor can become a whole drama if you don’t have that known dealer for you to see things in proportion. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. For minty MM, I'd definitely buy from an authorized Leica dealer.

I have an MM and love it. I purchased one new, but it became consumed in a seemingly endless wait for a sensor replacement. Just a year ago, I purchased another MM--new old stock. If it goes bad someday, I may be interested in a M10 monochrome (but have never been interested in a 246). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, otto.f said:

Right, I wouldn’t buy a digital camera with that sort of prices through eBay. I don’t know about your experience with digital M’s dimm, but a simple thing as dust on the sensor can become a whole drama if you don’t have that known dealer for you to see things in proportion. 

How dust can be tested? Shooting white list?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...