Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I tried the Q2 at Leica Duke St on Wednesday, compared to my CL (with 11-23 TL lens). I saw no sign that it was slower - seemed similar to me.

The Q2 EVF is slightly better than the CL's. Not in apparent sharpness, size or clarity, but slightly more responsive to movement - tested by panning. There was no possibility to check its low light performance - I couldn't find a really dark space in the shop - it worked OK in the dim cubbyhole where they keep binoculars and used equipment.

I went to look at it out of curiosity, and wasn't tempted by having it in the hand. It's a fine unit, but I have no need for a single FL camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read somewhere  lthat the Q measured AF in good light at 0.2 sec. In equal light the Q2 measured 0.1 sec. I don’t remember exactly where I read that. I’ve pretty much read all I can about the Q2. I expect DP Review will publish the AF performance when they do their full review. I’ve used the Q for the past 3+ years and have no complaints about AF. I don’t use it for video. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...