Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

What are the odds! 

Few days ago, over the weekend I used my M2 to shoot my cat drinking water from the tap. Tri-X 400. It so happened that today he wanted to drink water again (he likes tap water) and today I happened to have the same lens mounted on M240. 50Lux ASPH. I thought it will be fun to compare the BW shots in almost same setup and exposure. It surprised me that I had to add +1.3 exposure to the digital file to match Tri-X output. It was very low light (1/30, f/1.4 @ISO400).

You know which is which. :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by jmahto
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
  • 2 months later...

Adding film grain vs simulated digital grain (using LR) comparison for the same photos. Referred in another thread 

I created my own preset by looking at the TriX scan. Film has no grain in dark areas but simulated digital has uniform level of grain in white and dark both areas. I am sure better job can be done in PS but I wanted a quick conversion for myself. To be fair, the difference is minimal and visible only at close scrutiny.

The file names tell you which is which. (full size and 200% zoom).
 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by jmahto
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...