Jump to content

What's in a name?


spylaw4

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Or rather, what's the difference between them?

 

We all bandy the names about but just what factors make a Summicron a Summicron, and what distinguishes it from a Summilux, or an Elmarit? :confused:

 

I am NOT talking about resultant image quality, more about the inherent design/construction differences, that cause a lens to be called a 'cron, or a 'lux etc.etc.

 

Perhaps someone can explain this to me, please, or point me to an explanation?

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Master of the Obvious: the maximal aperture and therefore the lens design.

 

Angora:

 

NOOO. The design of a Leica lens does NOT flow from the name. Generally, for Leica, the name is dictated by the aperture ONLY. The design of the 19mm f2.8 Elmarit-R is obviously very different from the design of the 180 APO-Elmarit-R.

 

This is in contrast with Zeiss, where the name does imply the design: Biogon for symmetrical (RF) wide angle designs, Distagon for retrofocus wide-angles, Tessar for the classic four elements/three groups normal focal lenght lenses, Planal for double Gauss normal focal length, Sonnar for telephotos, Tele-Tessar for long teles, etc.

 

The Zeiss name says something about the design, the Leica name is generally redundant with the aperture.

 

Personnaly, I prefer the Zeiss approach.

 

Guy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Angora:

 

NOOO. The design of a Leica lens does NOT flow from the name. Generally, for Leica, the name is dictated by the aperture ONLY. The design of the 19mm f2.8 Elmarit-R is obviously very different from the design of the 180 APO-Elmarit-R.

 

This is in contrast with Zeiss, where the name does imply the design: Biogon for symmetrical (RF) wide angle designs, Distagon for retrofocus wide-angles, Tessar for the classic four elements/three groups normal focal lenght lenses, Planal for double Gauss normal focal length, Sonnar for telephotos, Tele-Tessar for long teles, etc.

 

The Zeiss name says something about the design, the Leica name is generally redundant with the aperture.

 

Personnaly, I prefer the Zeiss approach.

 

Guy

 

What I mean is: if the aperture is different, so is the design. A 50 mm opening @ f/2 has a different design than a 50 mm opening @ f/1.4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...