Jump to content

Back to the Q - So Long M10

thedwp
 Share

Recommended Posts

thedwp

thedwp

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I briefly posted about this here but it was leading to an EVF question....but as I continue reading about people leaving the Q and making the M10 plunge, I was just curious if anyone else has left the M10 and come back to the Q, or am I the lone wolf? 

 

The Q was my first Leica experience and I loved every minute of it. When I took the M10 plunge, I thought It was going to take the feeling I had for the Q and multiply it ten fold (pun intended). And at first, it was great. The M10 is a tank and the king of the hill for the moment. But almost right away I began to feel the 'which lenses' pressure.

 

Coming from Canon, then Fuji, the GAS monster was already lurking and I think after a couple of months I realized I was about to be back in the same boat as I was with my Fuji system...lens, lens, lens, lens! We all know how great the lux & crons are, and there are endless other choices.

 

Then came the lack of auto-focus...again I thought this was going to be a new adventure (and it was). It slowed me down, which was a good thing. I did enjoy the process. But to be honest, I started missing the simplicity of raising the camera and nailing a shot without having to think about focusing. That may sound like I'm lazy, but it's true...I missed my Q.  

 

I'm not a professional shooter, and I'm sure the newer sensor and overall engineering gave the 10 a leg up in IQ, but after comparing almost 2 years of Q images with the images I was getting with the 10...it just wasn't enough for me to stay with the 10.

 

I thought it was going to be really hard to walk away, and I felt bad for about a day after I sold it...but as soon as I had another Q in my hands, I can honestly say I don't miss it. 

 

Disclaimer: This is just my experience...I'm not bashing the 10 or those who use it...in any way. 

 

Here are a couple of snaps from my new Q just hours after getting it...nothing earth shattering, but man this little camera rocks. 

 
 

SaveSave

SaveSaveSaveSave

SaveSave

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest tofu_man

Guest tofu_man

Posted
Posted

 

I’m happy with a single lens too .....it would be interesting if Leica ever released a rangefinder with a fixed 28mm or 35mm lens. I think I now use MF on the Q much more than AF.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
prk60091

prk60091

Posted
Posted

I picked up and shot a dozen or so images today with a CL.

 

I am glad for the opportunity to shoot the CL but I am sticking with the Q for many of the same reasons as the OP mentioned.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
bags27

bags27

Posted
Posted

I have the same temptation with the CL. But as everyone's said, the pressure to pick the "right" lens. I recently got my Nikon FE cleaned and have been shooting film, and loving in. But the pressure to go out with the right lens....who needs that? I've taken only the Q on several weeks-long trip and never missed having a different camera or lens. If I can't crop to the Q, it's not a picture I need to have.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
bianco

bianco

Posted
Posted

I'm glad I came across this post. Thank you for sharing.

I was just thinking about jumping to M10 from Q, but the thought of using range finder focusing is daunting for me. I don't think I can live without the auto-focus and probably the manual focus assist features of the Q. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
tgdinamo

tgdinamo

Posted
Posted

I’ve been thinking of making the opposite move myself: Q to either M or CL. I find the single lens too restrictive. I’m glad you are happy with the switch.

 

I also sometimes wish to have a bit more reach than 28. However, instead of chosing between M or CL I'm hoping to eventually see another Q (ie summilux 50mm), so instead of switching lenses I can switch between two small cameras (and also have a perfect backup camera as a bonus).

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
hcklr

hcklr

Posted
Posted

I've gone down a similar path - I used to shoot an M6 film camera - then I got the Q and it changed absolutely everything for me. I recently got a Leica M240 with a 50mm Summicron (trying to scratch my curiosity about Leica digital rangefinder shooting) and I found that I was just never, ever choosing it over the Q. I recently sold all of it - except for my Q - I honestly couldn't be happier with my decision. I feel that Q is probably the best camera ever made. I'm very eagerly awaiting to see what they do with a Q version 2. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Le Chef

Le Chef

Posted
Posted

I check in on a regular basis to this forum as I love the images that are created by the folks here. It's hard to describe but it's like the difference between listening to vinyl vs. MP3.

 

That has caught me in a Bermuda Triangle of choices: the desire for simplicity after years of a bag full of Canon gear, the recognition that the "something lacking" in my pictures (apart from skill), is the lack of depth or richness of the images - back to the vinyl comparison.

 

The Q fits perfectly but the angst is missing different perspectives when you have one lens and one lens only. I could go towards a CL but I don't want loads of lenses anymore. Or I could rekindle the past using my father's rangefinder and getting an M.

 

Consequently I'm waiting until Photokina has finished before I take the plunge. But the Q is awfully appealing...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Voxen

Voxen

Posted
Posted

The Q fits perfectly but the angst is missing different perspectives when you have one lens and one lens only.

 

It’s only in your head, I can say it because I had the same fear when I dedided to replace a full bag of lenses with the Q alone.

 

I thought I’d miss a lot of shots, and I surely do, but I still come back home with many shots often more than before because I don’t waste my time swapping lenses anymore, so it’s more time for taking pictures!

 

And the quality of my work - whatever it is - had not decreased, I think it has improved a little bit, so really I have no regrets living with the 28mm alone.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
WillieM

WillieM

Posted
Posted

So I was ready to buy the M in addition to my Q and thought

about checking in at the Forum....glad I did...thank you. Dispelled my M thoughts...just returned from two week trip to London with nothing but my Q...left the Canon at home and hoped for the best...boy what a great decision...figure only thing M might offer is mucho dinero lens options which I never missed on trip...put mucho dinero in sock with other dinero.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr.Q

Mr.Q

Posted
Posted

I've done my rounds with other Leica cameras, including the M9-P(gone), M10(gone), CL(gone) and SL. The only constant in my bag was the Q, and I've never considered selling it. There is no replacement for the Q in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
qvsm

qvsm

Posted
Posted

I've done my rounds with other Leica cameras, including the M9-P(gone), M10(gone), CL(gone) and SL. The only constant in my bag was the Q, and I've never considered selling it. There is no replacement for the Q in my opinion.

You kept the SL?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...