Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Being able to do it, I’ve made Leica 1A replicas that take a small glass plate, so you get grainless negatives with Leica lenses!

 

Would love to hear more about this - how did you make the replicas, how did you insert glass plates? Any photos to share? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In The Guardian - The black art: wet plate collodion photography – video

 

Anyone tempted?   :)

 

Are you tempted by using of hazard chemicals? Like very hazard? I'm not.

What for?

Film is still made, paper is still available.  If I need special effects on my prints I do it in lith. I also want to try Bromoil.

Those two methods are not limiting on how and what I'm taking exposure of.

Collodion thing is very limited to still objects. As result all you could get with it is still life (very boring) or portraits with people looking half-dead (very creepy).

The reason why I choose rangefinders is because they are best to capture the flow and moments of life. Even within landscape photography.

Yet, "collodion" is common popup on forums like this. Someone will rediscover about collodion and make thread about it. Like this one.

Here is novelty factor, but once you start to look into it and follow it, the novelty factor dyes quickly. Because all photos looks the same.

Special effect prevails photography with collodion.

Personally, I'm more into tintypes to try then film will become less available.

Edited by Ko.Fe.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I personally know of two incidents regarding the process. The first was the wife of a photographer being burned when she attempted to light a lamp filled with alcohol and a poorly fitting wick inside a cabinet he used to dry plates. The second was a guy accidently spilling a full pint can of ether inside his apartment. No one hurt but the entire NYC hazmat squad was deployed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally know of two incidents regarding the process. The first was the wife of a photographer being burned when she attempted to light a lamp filled with alcohol and a poorly fitting wick inside a cabinet he used to dry plates. The second was a guy accidently spilling a full pint can of ether inside his apartment. No one hurt but the entire NYC hazmat squad was deployed!

 

Being chemist myself, this is one of the reason why I currently disregard getting into this in my private home. Keeping and handling standard film development stuff there is okay, but wet plate stuff would be on another level for which I would consider only doing in sort of converted lab-based environment with better vented space, too. The chemist in me is very appealed to give it a try at some point, and when I have a lot of time on my hands which is currently not often the case. The application of wet plate based photography would have severe limitations on me, too since I am not too involved into portrait photography either and have less of incentive to go into this direction. I still admire if someone is doing this and has a passion for it. Great stuff on your website!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s the Wet Plate Leica I built

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

I call this “Well Read” 1/4 Plate Black Glass ambrotype

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Harrison was a self taught optician and he died in 1864. His lenses were/are regarded as the best available. He invented the “Globe” lens which was basically round and worked at F36 it was/is the finest defining wide angle lens ever.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you tempted by using of hazard chemicals? Like very hazard? I'm not.

What for?

Film is still made, paper is still available.  If I need special effects on my prints I do it in lith. I also want to try Bromoil.

Those two methods are not limiting on how and what I'm taking exposure of.

Collodion thing is very limited to still objects. As result all you could get with it is still life (very boring) or portraits with people looking half-dead (very creepy).

The reason why I choose rangefinders is because they are best to capture the flow and moments of life. Even within landscape photography.

Yet, "collodion" is common popup on forums like this. Someone will rediscover about collodion and make thread about it. Like this one.

Here is novelty factor, but once you start to look into it and follow it, the novelty factor dyes quickly. Because all photos looks the same.

Special effect prevails photography with collodion.

Personally, I'm more into tintypes to try then film will become less available.

Perhaps not everyone in the World has the same likes and dislikes as you, Ko.Fe. The World would be a pretty dull lump of rock if we did all like the same thing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...