Steve McGarrett Posted October 10, 2017 Share #1  Posted October 10, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi everyone,  Someone want to share some first-hand experience in adapting Distagon 1.4/35 ZM on SL and comparing its rendering with M240/262/10? Any noticeable difference between M and SL? Same sharpness across the frame at fast apertures settings?  Thank you in advance  S. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 10, 2017 Posted October 10, 2017 Hi Steve McGarrett, Take a look here Distagon ZM 35/1.4 - SL vs M. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
geetee1972 Posted October 10, 2017 Share #2 Â Posted October 10, 2017 I can't answer you directly, but this might help: Â http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2015/05/22/the-zeiss-35-1-4-distagon-zm-leica-mount-lens-my-1st-look-wow/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve McGarrett Posted October 10, 2017 Author Share #3  Posted October 10, 2017 I can't answer you directly, but this might help:  http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2015/05/22/the-zeiss-35-1-4-distagon-zm-leica-mount-lens-my-1st-look-wow/  Thank you for the link, Geetee, but I wasn't looking for a general review of the Distagon 35, I already know the lens, I have it  I just would like to know how it renders on the SL and if there is any difference in using it with SL rather than on a M-camera... searching the archives I've found a chart with an evaluation of some Leica M lenses corner performance with SL and M, it rates the Distagon one point lower if used on SL at fast apertures... I would like to hear the opinion of some people who actually use it on the SL... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted October 10, 2017 Share #4  Posted October 10, 2017 You may be referring to my tests. It produces spectacular images on the M ...... very close to the outstanding Summilux 35/1.4.  Results on the SL are equally good. There is a marginal difference in corner performance, mostly close up, but in real life you will not notice it.  With wide angle lenses the corners are usually sky or OOF near foreground anyway. Unless you are obsessed with photographing brick walls at 2-3m you will be hard pressed to fault this lens.  If you are referring to my results look at the 'grading' notes and examples..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orjanf Posted October 10, 2017 Share #5 Â Posted October 10, 2017 In my tests (tripod, m240 focused using live view and loupe) the performance of the 35/1.4zm is virtually identical on the SL compared to the M240. Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mls1483 Posted October 11, 2017 Share #6 Â Posted October 11, 2017 I did a side-by-side comparison of the Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/1.4 ZM (through all stops) on the M10 and the SL last time I was in Wetzlar. The performance is virtually identical (sharpness, contrast, CA, flare, vignetting. Rendition also seems to be the same. Unfortunately, the Leitz park is mainly white, so colors were difficult to judge. Â I did not code the lens or apply a profile. At f/1.4 vignetting is therefore pretty pronounced and judging coner performance is difficult. From f/4.0 onwards, vignetting is no more an issue. The lens is then incredibly sharp throughout the frame and very well corrected. It is almost a perfect lens. In addition and most important, it also draws very beautifully. Â I summed up my experiences in a thread in the German section: Â https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/239165-zeiss-distagon-14-35-zm/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve McGarrett Posted October 11, 2017 Author Share #7  Posted October 11, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) thighslapper, on 10 Oct 2017 - 23:32, said:thighslapper, on 10 Oct 2017 - 23:32, said:thighslapper, on 10 Oct 2017 - 23:32, said: You may be referring to my tests. It produces spectacular images on the M ...... very close to the outstanding Summilux 35/1.4.  Results on the SL are equally good. There is a marginal difference in corner performance, mostly close up, but in real life you will not notice it.  With wide angle lenses the corners are usually sky or OOF near foreground anyway. Unless you are obsessed with photographing brick walls at 2-3m you will be hard pressed to fault this lens.  If you are referring to my results look at the 'grading' notes and examples.....  If it's you who have done this chart, then yes, I was referring to your tests  Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  I've read the notes, I am concerned about "1s" and "2s"... as you said, I think that from 3 onwards differences are very minor in real life, aren't they? Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!  I've read the notes, I am concerned about "1s" and "2s"... as you said, I think that from 3 onwards differences are very minor in real life, aren't they? ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/277706-distagon-zm-3514-sl-vs-m/?do=findComment&comment=3374153'>More sharing options...
Steve McGarrett Posted October 11, 2017 Author Share #8  Posted October 11, 2017 mls1483, on 11 Oct 2017 - 15:42, said:mls1483, on 11 Oct 2017 - 15:42, said: I did a side-by-side comparison of the Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/1.4 ZM (through all stops) on the M10 and the SL last time I was in Wetzlar. The performance is virtually identical (sharpness, contrast, CA, flare, vignetting. Rendition also seems to be the same. Unfortunately, the Leitz park is mainly white, so colors were difficult to judge.  I did not code the lens or apply a profile. At f/1.4 vignetting is therefore pretty pronounced and judging coner performance is difficult. From f/4.0 onwards, vignetting is no more an issue. The lens is then incredibly sharp throughout the frame and very well corrected. It is almost a perfect lens. In addition and most important, it also draws very beautifully.  I summed up my experiences in a thread in the German section:  https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/239165-zeiss-distagon-14-35-zm/  Yes, I find this lens quite stunning on M240, that's why I would like to be sure that I'm not losing anything should I switch to SL...  Thank you for the link above, now let's see what google translate thinks about it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mls1483 Posted October 16, 2017 Share #9  Posted October 16, 2017 You may be referring to my tests. It produces spectacular images on the M ...... very close to the outstanding Summilux 35/1.4.  Results on the SL are equally good. There is a marginal difference in corner performance, mostly close up, but in real life you will not notice it.  With wide angle lenses the corners are usually sky or OOF near foreground anyway. Unless you are obsessed with photographing brick walls at 2-3m you will be hard pressed to fault this lens.  If you are referring to my results look at the 'grading' notes and examples.....   Which version of the Summicron 28mm did you test? The old one (11604) or the new one (11672)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
helged Posted October 16, 2017 Share #10  Posted October 16, 2017 Which version of the Summicron 28mm did you test? The old one (11604) or the new one (11672)?   thighslapper's original post is from Nov 2015. The 11672 28Cron-M came early 2016, so the spread sheet reflects the 'old' 28Cron-M. The new 28Cron, as well as the new 28Elmarit-M, have a improved corner sharpness. For the latter, see a little down in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted October 16, 2017 Share #11  Posted October 16, 2017 correct helged ...... and that is why Leica quietly changed the optics in the few lenses that performed badly in the digital world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
helged Posted October 17, 2017 Share #12 Â Posted October 17, 2017 Actually, the new 28Elmarit-M has become my general, go-to 28mm lens. Its hard to imagine better optics in a smaller body. Impressive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irakly Shanidze Posted October 28, 2017 Share #13 Â Posted October 28, 2017 I wrote a review on this lens for Zeiss USA a few years back, and since then has not changed my mind: it renders better than any Leica 1.4/35 ASPH lens. Its combination of sharpness and plasticity is unsurpassed. Â Image below: Leica M10, Zeiss Distagon 1.4/35 @ f/2.8 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.