2wk Posted September 27, 2017 Share #21 Posted September 27, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Not the SC version which suffers in turn from a lot of flare and from focus shift as well. I have the SC version. It flares at 1.4 but the hood helps and at F2.0 it doesn't flare. Yea I think it actually has less focus shift than my 50 Summilux ASPH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 Hi 2wk, Take a look here What focal length has been used here?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
luigi bertolotti Posted September 27, 2017 Share #22 Posted September 27, 2017 24 is my guess (supposed FF of course) ... Leica or not... haven't idea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raphael Posted October 17, 2017 Author Share #23 Posted October 17, 2017 He does own a Leica M and only uses an old non-Leica 35mm 1.4 lens that he bought in Hongkonk for 1/10th of the price of a Leica lens. He likes the rendering of this lens and thinks Leica lenses are way too expensive... The one picture in the link to his flickr page was made with his Leica M. I just found the linked picture again in this gallery: https://www.behance.net/gallery/53001729/With-Charleen-in-Barcelona Here he used the tags Leica M240 and 35mm, so I guess you were right. Must be his 35mm f/1.4. Thanks everyone! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.