Deliberate1 Posted August 22, 2017 Share #1 Posted August 22, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Friends, to those of you who use the Contax adapter, I would like to know how easy you find it to remove it from the lens. I have had mine for at least a year and use it primarily with the 120mm and 210mm. Sometimes it comes off very easily, and other times it is real chore to remove. Usually the hard times are when I am particularly pressed for time. And so it goes. Do others have this experience, and if so any suggestions, tips or tricks to pass on. Obliged. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Hi Deliberate1, Take a look here Recalcitrant C adapter. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jip Posted August 23, 2017 Share #2 Posted August 23, 2017 I leave the adapter on the camera when I unmount the C645 lens. I feel it's tight but not overly so... just press the pin back fully and twist. It feels just as tight with all the C645 lenses I have, so it's not a difference per lens. 35/45/120/140/210 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photon42 Posted August 23, 2017 Share #3 Posted August 23, 2017 Mine is relatively tight, but then I did not use it already for a extended period. Compared to the original, definitely tighter - almost too tight, but probably better than too loose. I would not say it is a pain during normal operations, and I do change lenses easily multiple times when out and about. The lenses are lacking a proper dedicated grip at a non-turning place, which is mostly missing with the Planar 2/80. I use it with the 35, 80 and 140. Nice combo btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickgrainger Posted August 24, 2017 Share #4 Posted August 24, 2017 I had to look up what recalcitrant meant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted August 24, 2017 Share #5 Posted August 24, 2017 Let's just say the whole S system is recalcitrant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliberate1 Posted August 24, 2017 Author Share #6 Posted August 24, 2017 I had to look up what recalcitrant meant. I would tell you, but that would make me compliant... Cheers. D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliberate1 Posted August 24, 2017 Author Share #7 Posted August 24, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Mine is relatively tight, but then I did not use it already for a extended period. Compared to the original, definitely tighter - almost too tight, but probably better than too loose. I would not say it is a pain during normal operations, and I do change lenses easily multiple times when out and about. The lenses are lacking a proper dedicated grip at a non-turning place, which is mostly missing with the Planar 2/80. I use it with the 35, 80 and 140. Nice combo btw. I think the C adapter is one of the best things to come out of Wetzlar (or wherever it is made). Again, I have the 35, 110 and 210. Each is an excellent performer - not to mention absolutely reliable. And I got all of the lenses, all in mint condition, for less than the retail price of the adapter. For me, access to Contax lenses completes the S system. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted August 24, 2017 Share #8 Posted August 24, 2017 I think the C adapter is one of the best things to come out of Wetzlar (or wherever it is made). Portugal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photon42 Posted August 24, 2017 Share #9 Posted August 24, 2017 I think the C adapter is one of the best things to come out of Wetzlar (or wherever it is made). Again, I have the 35, 110 and 210. Each is an excellent performer - not to mention absolutely reliable. And I got all of the lenses, all in mint condition, for less than the retail price of the adapter. For me, access to Contax lenses completes the S system. David As you mention the 110 - typo or Hasselblad? Got the latter, too, which is as well a nice lens. Easy enough still to focus on slow moving objects. Cheers Ivo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliberate1 Posted August 25, 2017 Author Share #10 Posted August 25, 2017 As you mention the 110 - typo or Hasselblad? Got the latter, too, which is as well a nice lens. Easy enough still to focus on slow moving objects. Cheers Ivo Ivo, typo. I agree that the 120mm is quite special. And the macro function is a bonus. I am not much of a flower shooter, but an image of some roses, converted to B&W, is one of my favorite and more successful images. I think that lens cost me $700. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xiaubauu2009 Posted August 27, 2017 Share #11 Posted August 27, 2017 Contax 645 120mm with IQ3 100mp Alpa 12FPS with shift adaptor Love this lens! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photon42 Posted August 28, 2017 Share #12 Posted August 28, 2017 Contax 645 120mm with IQ3 100mp Alpa 12FPS with shift adaptor Love this lens! That means you ceased the right of posting the image here [emoji51] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photon42 Posted August 28, 2017 Share #13 Posted August 28, 2017 I had to look up what recalcitrant meant. You do not have teenagers in your home, it seems Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted August 30, 2017 Share #14 Posted August 30, 2017 You do not have teenagers in your home, it seems hahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.