bill Posted June 20, 2007 Share #1 Posted June 20, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Mr Earley kindly passed on to me one of his 5cm Elmars the other day. I promised to give it a good home and to use it to the best of my ability. These are some of the first fruits... [ATTACH]42537[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]42538[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]42539[/ATTACH] IIIc, 5cm Elmar, Kodak 400CN Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 20, 2007 Posted June 20, 2007 Hi bill, Take a look here Thanks James. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
waileong Posted June 21, 2007 Share #2 Posted June 21, 2007 Is this sepia tone natural, or did you do Photoshop it before posting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizard Posted June 21, 2007 Share #3 Posted June 21, 2007 Bill, it certainly looks as if this lens HAS found a good new home. And as before when James posted photographs he had taken with this lens, I am impressed by the quality. I take it is James' first Elmar you have aquired? Enjoy the new addition to your stable! Regards, Andreas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jc_braconi Posted June 21, 2007 Share #4 Posted June 21, 2007 Hello Bill, is it the 2.8 or the 3.5 ? and if 3.5 is it the red dial ? Congratulations for the pictures ! Regards JC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted June 21, 2007 Share #5 Posted June 21, 2007 Bill, Glad you're enjoying the lens, I've been waiting to see some results. Can I have it back now? This is the earlier black scale 3.5 Elmar. Wonderful lens as the results show. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted June 21, 2007 Share #6 Posted June 21, 2007 Crumble...teh 400cn works good on the stainless and chrome doesnt it. It could become an expensive passion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted June 21, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted June 21, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thanks all. @ Lee, no, the toning is done in Photoshop. I have a very straightforward workflow. I tweak levels and contrast, then convert to b/w before tritoning. Finally I boost brightness slightly to compensate for the toning. Occasionally I crop, but otherwise I leave as is. @ Rob, yes, I love the rendition of chrome and metallic reflective surfaces that 400CN gives. I think the toning helps too, to bring it out. It has a pleasant (as opposed to Canon digital) "plasticity" that suits the subject. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
noddy Posted June 21, 2007 Share #8 Posted June 21, 2007 I have to say Bill, like other posters, I over the tone. What settings do you use on the tritone? Andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jc_braconi Posted June 21, 2007 Share #9 Posted June 21, 2007 Hi James, The lens that makes you finishing second in the Paris challenge ? Hummmm! Regards JC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted June 21, 2007 Author Share #10 Posted June 21, 2007 @ James - How can I say this... No! @ Andy - the settings I use are: Ink 1: Black Ink 2: PANTONE 114C Ink 3: PANTONE 140C It's taken me ages to settle on these, and they just "work" for me, particularly with this type of subject matter. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elansprint72 Posted June 21, 2007 Share #11 Posted June 21, 2007 Bill, You're nearly there; keep working on it, buddy. Actually; you bastard........... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
twom4 Posted June 24, 2007 Share #12 Posted June 24, 2007 Good lens in good hands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted June 24, 2007 Author Share #13 Posted June 24, 2007 Praise indeed, Chris. Thank you. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.