Jump to content

Large M9 print


Herman.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This is a seamless print on wallpaper size: 4,8 X 2,6 M.

The detail and sharpness is amazing...

M9 and 28MM elmarit and still happy with it.

 

Best Regards,

Herman.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kodak used to display 18 ft. X 60 ft. transparancies in New York's Grand Central Station. They originally used 8x20 large format, but later a number of them were taken on 35mm Kodachrome.

 

 

From Kodachrome,  they made inter negs or positives ignored to get the large print.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a seamless print on wallpaper size: 4,8 X 2,6 M.

The detail and sharpness is amazing...

M9 and 28MM elmarit and still happy with it.

 

Best Regards,

Herman.

So much for the Megapixel debate... :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past, I would shoot 120 film and make what I'd call medium sized prints (18x12 inches or 45.7x30.5 cm. printed image area) from Fuji Velvia 50 chromes, both on Ilfochrome medium and from scanned chromes printed by Epson inkjet printers. 

 

At the same print size with color prints being made on the same Epson inkjet printer, my M-P 240 using M lenses beats 120 film prints hands down in terms of printed image quality.  The prints coming from the M-P 240/M glass and the Epson printer look - to my eye, at least - like they would equal or surpass even 4x5 inch film based prints in terms of printed image quality. 

 

This leaves me wondering:  Have others out there experienced similar printed results from the combination of M lenses and the M240 camera platform?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...