Jump to content

M(249) M-P - with Voigtländer 15 mm 4,5


Olsen

Recommended Posts

I don't bother with this lens - I tried a few options when I had the lens first but now just leave the M240 on auto lens detection as I find the results absolutely fine. It's a superb lens and great fun to use, particularly 'shooting from the hip' - although I suppose the purists would dismiss that as lazy photography !

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you set the camera on 'auto lens detection' it will look for a lens code which is not there.  I tried three settings (16  mm WATE, 24 mm 2,8 and 'off').  I can't see 'any' fignificant difference.   All the three settings produced 'red flag' at the edges.  Don't the manual settings work?  Or is something wrong with my camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather something with the lens. Obviously Leica does not provide in-camera corrections for third-party lenses, so it is quite possible that there is no way to avoid colour shifts towards the edges with this lens. The solution is to use flat field correction, which is integrated in C1, and I think a plug-in for Lightroom.

BTW, the WATE profile is quite mild and the same for all three focal lengths, as this lens does not need much. The most pronounced corrections are to be found in the 21/28 mm profiles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone here with user-experience with this combo:  M(240)/M-P with Voigländer 15 mm 4,5.  Which manual lens setting do you use?

Which version of the Voigtlander 15mm are we talking about? The latest 3rd version is fine without any coding. The earlier versions did have problems with Italian flag colour casts which were difficult to remove completely by coding and often required correction with the Lightroom flat field plugin. Of course if you shoot in monochrome there is no problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a V1 (LTM, same optics as the V2 M-mount w/52mm filter) coded as a 21/2.8 Pre-ASPH, and find it corrects enough of the edge color cast so it passes muster 90% of the time (100% in b&w fo course).  I also have the V3, which as others have said seems to do fine uncoded other than not imbedding the lens info in EXIF.  I still travel with the V1 as it's so tiny and light.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lens profile takes care of distortion and vignetting (not sure), not color shading. You need flatfield plug-in for that.

 

Sure, and it is color shading that is the problem with using this Voigtländer 15 mm 4,5 on a M(240)/M-P.  What puzzles me is that 'there is no significant change' if I apply a manual '16 mm setting' - or with the 'lens correction turned off'.  Why is that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, and it is color shading that is the problem with using this Voigtländer 15 mm 4,5 on a M(240)/M-P.  What puzzles me is that 'there is no significant change' if I apply a manual '16 mm setting' - or with the 'lens correction turned off'.  Why is that?

M240 does not have correction information for CV15 (since it is not a Leica lens). Several folks have tried different lens coding with some success but it won't cure fully. WATE 16mm is more telecentric design (rear element is not that close to sensor as in CV15) with less of color shading problem. This is why 16mm setting correction is not useful in your case. Your best bet is to use flat field correction with LR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...