Jump to content

Camera reset itself to factury default!


jto555

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This is maddening! I used the camera this morning and all was well, my second shoot this afternoon the camera had reset itself to factury default settings. I only noticed when I wen to check the ISO just before the shoot and found that I was on Auto ISO. This would have really messed up my manual flash shots!

 

Right, the camera is about 9 months old

Firmware is 2.0.3

Battery was fresh and at 100%.

The battery that came out to be charged before I left for the second shoot was at 30%.

 

I did NOT reset the camera setting instead of formating the card, however I did format the card in the camera. If I had reset the camera instead of formating the card the photos from the earlier shoot would still have been on the card.

 

This seems to happed about once or twice a year and it "does my head in". Thank God that Leica have changed the default setting to include shooting RAW. But that really is not good enough.

 

 

 

Has anybody else had this happen with the latest firmware?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It happens, but it is to me just a minor annoyance - I choose my profile in the set menu before each shoot anyway.

My other little trick is that I have the framelines in red in my standard user profile, so I notice immediately when I am in some other profile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jaapv, that is a very good idea.

 

Steve, yes it has happened before with each of the firmwares. About once or twice a year and the camera has been back to Leica. My guess is there is still a bug in the firmware.

 

Philipp, yes installing a firmware update does reset the camera. However I did not do a firmware update yesterday before the camera reset itself.

 

 

I have two bodies and both have had the same reset issue. I guess I am just lucky... :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

We talk about 'firmware' rather than 'software'. The normal distinction firmware sets up an FPGA at boot time to configure the logic within the device, software differs in being a decision based engine resulting in branching, looping etc and it's probably fair to say software has more potential for errors for medium complex programmes. However, FPGA firmware is somewhat easier to debug and probably more deterministic in nature. If it's the case that the M240 is running firmware, I find it surprising that the designers have not fully debugged the code.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We talk about 'firmware' rather than 'software'. The normal distinction firmware sets up an FPGA at boot time to configure the logic within the device, software differs in being a decision based engine resulting in branching, looping etc and it's probably fair to say software has more potential for errors for medium complex programmes. However, FPGA firmware is somewhat easier to debug and probably more deterministic in nature. If it's the case that the M240 is running firmware, I find it surprising that the designers have not fully debugged the code.

The thing that lives within a Leica camera can be properly called "software". The distinction between "firmware" and "software" is becoming moot, anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing that lives within a Leica camera can be properly called "software". The distinction between "firmware" and "software" is becoming moot, anyway.

You can edit and change software. You cannot fiddle with firmware. No such thing as becoming moot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can edit and change software. You cannot fiddle with firmware. No such thing as becoming moot.

Fuji calls the thing within the camera an OS and software. They have a software development system. The camera has embedded computers, those computers are programmed and programs usually are called "software". The fact that I personally can not change that software is immaterial. I can not change the software in my cell phone, either. More information here: http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/EDG/binary/pdf/find/24-1e/3.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

FPGA code is usually written in C, but Boolean will do as well. And of course it can be edited compiled and reloaded into the E^2. That's the benefit of FPGAs it's an uncommitted array of gates and functions. At boot time the silicon array is configured by the stored programme, and then works as a hard-wired array.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...