Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The R-adapter L is now available at Ffordes.  Mine's coming tomorrow.  Thought anyone chasing this might appreciate the heads-up. Check the price too...

It's back to saying "pre-order" now.  Did they sell out?  My US supplier hasn't heard a peep.  (The price seems to be mistaken.)

 

scott

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally found a R-Adapter L.

 

It definitively worth it if your have ROM lenses from the compatibility list, and even more so if you have a ROM Vario.

 

All my ROM Leica R lenses are working well and are showing automatically the focal length used in review mode and the name of the lens and the focal length used in the exif.

 

The camera knows the minimum and maximum aperture of each lens, which improves the correctness of the estimation of the aperture by the SL.

 

With some surprises.

 

My 80/1,4 is a 81mm, 180/2,8 = 178mm, 280/2,8 = 276mm, Vario 21-35 = 21-34mm, Vario 28-90 = 29-90mm and Vario 35-70 = 35-67mm.

 

;)

 

Only my 19, 50 and 90 are showing the same focal length.

 

The ROM Vario 21-35, 28-90 and 35-70 are all showing the intermediate focal lengths.

 

They are all working like the SL 24-90 without the AF.

 

The SF 64 flash head zooms like it should (tried during the Photokina), the same it works with the SL 24-90.

 

The Vario-Apo-Elmarit 70-180/2,8, as expected, is only showing 70mm, which is better than 0mm.

 

;)

 

The R Apo-Extender 2X ROM doesn't transmit the resulting focal length or the resulting aperture, is showing 0mm in review mode and block access to the list of R lenses in camera.

 

The R Macro-Adapter  ROM doesn't transmit the focal length, is showing 0mm in review mode and block access to the list of R lenses in camera.

 

It is strange because they were working correctly with the R9.

 

The only way to access the list with those two accessories is it to use them with a non-ROM adapter, like the stacked R-Adapter M and M-Adapter L or the Novoflex R-Adapter L.

 

I hope that an updated firmware will solve this problem.

 

Because it cannot be ROMed, the Apo-Extender 1,4X used together with the R-Adapter L give access to the R lenses list in camera.

 

But remember that the Apo-Extender 1,4X can only be mounted on a ROM lens by activating manually the aperture cam and only then can the combo be mounted on the SL (which is not equipped with the R9 internal lever to move the aperture cam in the correct position)

 

All the non-ROM R lenses used together with the R-Adapter L give access to the R lenses list in the SL menu.

 

 

Now about the removable tripod mount.

 

If you want to use it to put the camera + lens combo closer to the center of gravity, you will need to add a long lens plate backward.

 

Like on the pictures bellow.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Leicaiste
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the AutoISO calculation of minimum shutter speed (1/f or 1/2f) in the SL respond to the focal length that the new adapter passes to it from Vario lenses?  If you still get 1/30. that will mean it didn't, but I hope this is now fixed...

 

scott

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the AutoISO calculation of minimum shutter speed (1/f or 1/2f) in the SL respond to the focal length that the new adapter passes to it from Vario lenses?  If you still get 1/30. that will mean it didn't, but I hope this is now fixed...

 

scott

Yes it works like it should. A big improvement !

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leicaiste,

 

are you happy with the results of the 28-90 on the SL? It's certainly smaller and lighter than the SL's 24-90. The SL somewhat interests me but with a 2.8-4.0/28-90 Vario-Elmarit-R, 2.0/50 Summicron-R and 4.0/80-200 Varoio-Elmar-R, plenty of M lenses, and no interest in AF I'm not in a rush for either of the SL's native lenses.

 

Mark

Edited by MarkP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should be careful how we express our enthusiasm for this adapter.  Leica has to see it selling more SLs rather than conclude that it impedes the sales of Vario-Elmarit-SLs.  Otherwise they may continue issuing the adapters at the current rate of one per month for a long time.  :<{

 

scott

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leicaiste,are you happy with the results of the 28-90 on the SL? It's certainly smaller and lighter than the SL's 24-90. The SL somewhat interests me but with a 2.8-4.0/28-90 Vario-Elmarit-R, 2.0/50 Summicron-R and 4.0/80-200 Varoio-Elmar-R, plenty of M lenses, and no interest in AF I'm not in a rush for either of the SL's native lenses.Mark

Like you I have also plenty of R and M lenses.

 

I had the SL 24-90 on loan for a month and used it like I use (again) the R 28-90 since I received my SL in December.

 

I didn't make any direct comparisons.

 

At the end of the loan, I had the opportunity to buy the SL for a good price.

 

I passed because of its size and the size of the lens hood.

 

On the other hand, I intend to sell the R 70-180/2,8 and 280/2,8 and buy a SL 90-280.

 

Even if I much prefer the ergonomic of these R lenses, the IS and AF of the 90-280 makes up for the difference.

 

It didn't for me with the 24-90.

 

Also I will most certainly order a SL 75/2.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And I love the R 28-90 on the SL.

 

The problem I had with it on the R9 was the viewfinder darkening on 90mm making a bit hard to focus sometimes.

 

This problem disappeared on the SL thanks to the wonderful EVF.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And I love the R 28-90 on the SL.

 

The problem I had with it on the R9 was the viewfinder darkening on 90mm making a bit hard to focus sometimes.

 

This problem disappeared on the SL thanks to the wonderful EVF.

 

 

Thanks

 

very useful information

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Size comparison :

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should be careful how we express our enthusiasm for this adapter.  Leica has to see it selling more SLs rather than conclude that it impedes the sales of Vario-Elmarit-SLs.  Otherwise they may continue issuing the adapters at the current rate of one per month for a long time.  :<{

 

scott

 

 

I see the same trend for the M-adapter... Lately it mostly has been not available at B&H, Adorama, Leica Store Miami, etc.  

 

I understand that it is often Leica's strategy to not want to flood the market but this is a bit too ridiculous for words IMHO...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 Lately it mostly has been not available at B&H, Adorama, Leica Store Miami, etc.  

 

I understand that it is often Leica's strategy to not want to flood the market but this is a bit too ridiculous for words IMHO...

 

I see a new one on eBay now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This adapter is still rare enough that I thought I would share the unboxing experience.  (Well, it's Leica after all...)

 

On my messy desktop, with an A4 pad and a WD Passport USB drive to give a sense of scale:

 

30599422462_2cc79180c3_o.jpgDSCF2587 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

30415709470_0f5ef7ac6d_o.jpgDSCF2588 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

30716221745_b3e807fb8e_o.jpgDSCF2590 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

30627743281_51a364d4bc_o.jpgDSCF2596 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Played with the new adapter briefly last night.  It's balanced with the longer lenses installed, especially the 180/2.8 (see picture), but can topple over backwards while you change lenses...  I think I will end up leaving the bracket off.  The 280 has a tripod mount on the lens barrel.

 

Leicaiste points out that when an accessory such as the APO 2X extender is used with the new smart R-adapter, neither the identity of the extender nor the new focal length of the extended lens comes through.  He concluded that access to the list of R lenses and their profiles was blocked.  I found something even stranger.  I used the extender with a 180 R lens and the EXIF showed 15mm focal length, which was the last ID I had set while using the stacked adapters.

 

30427763370_d624df37d8_o.jpgDSCF2604 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

30691191896_09003d8678_o.jpgDSCF2607 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more point to be checked.  With the new adapter, the focal length in current use in R zoom lenses is reported, showing up in the review panels and in the Exif.  And a pleasant surprise, firmware 2.x calculates a distortion correction as a function of that focal length, at least for some of the zooms!  I see this in the 21-35, but not in the 35-70 f/4 (which was not a Leica design).  I suspect that the 28-90 might have variable corrections as well, but I don't have one to test. 

 

scott

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...