Jump to content

Monochrom and 35


Hayek

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have been using a 35 Summicron asph which is a great lens and recently just picked up an older 35 Summilux V.2 (1975) which I just sent out to Youxin Ye this morning for a CLA ...I think I'm going to like how tiny it is..
The bottom plane photo was shot with my M8
 

35 Summicron asph

23776333580_00d555c5b5_b.jpgflower_girl by Peter, on Flickr
 
35 Summilux pre-asph V.2 (1975)
27308473792_9476e6a578_b.jpgPiper by Peter, on Flickr
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did. Still lacks the sparkle of modern glass.

 

 

Interesting suggestion. How does this lens render?

 

Here a  shot taken with the UC Hexanon 35 LTM on the M240 for lack of a true MM shot to share :

 

 

21518289495_314323c42c_b.jpg

St Pair sur Mer by JM__, on Flickr

 

and a couple in color here: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/186858-the-view-through-older-glass/?p=3056845

 

Best, JM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found a very nice Summaron 2.8, just fits the Monochrom nicely and the results are excellent.

 

 

 My M240/Summilux ASPH and the Mono/Summaron.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went backwards with my M246 on lens preferences.  Love the older Summicrons, 35 and 50 pre Asph, and Noctilux V1.  They render so beautifully on this camera, the Mandler designed lenses.  My original V4 Summicron 35mm, will never let it go!  Lightest of them all.  I do have a few more up to date lenses, but prefer them on color.  I also put on an ancient v1 Summicron R 35mm and it just blew me away.  I still have to use that one more, but it's so clunky on on M!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It is wonderful on the Monochrom 1 :) I don't like it on the M9 either - too much moiré. It does fine on the M240 as well, but I like the colour rendering of the Summicron asph better and was mightily impressed by the Distagon 35/1.4

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had those three Zeiss ZM 35 lenses, 1.4, 2.0 and 2.8. The 1.4 now is my #1 on MM246.

 

Yes, there is finder blockade with this Lens, and it weights a bit more than the others. But I can accept this because of the phenominal IQ and the wonderful new opportunities while shooting with 1.4.

 

The 2.8 is absolutly comparable in terms of IQ. So I have to decide each time between the light and small, but "only 2.8" on one hand and the bright 1.4 on the other hand.

 

When I bought these two lenses for the 246 I thougt I would use both, depending on the field of application. In practice, I use 99 % the 1.4, because of speed and the ultimative IQ at 1.4.

 

The Biogon 2.0 is a wonderful lens for film, but not a good decision for digital Leicas because of low IQ in the edges. So, I sold the 2.0, and it seems to me that the very nice little 2.8 has to leave as well, for budget reasons.

 

Sorry, I can't tell you anything about 35er Leica lenses, as I never had one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...