Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

An all-weather,shock-proof freeze-proof, waterproof, crush-proof camera certainly holds some appeal. Especially if you like going taking photos in the outdoors. So how will the XU compare?

 

More will be known once snappers can actually get their hands on it, but as the market stands right now (January 2016), who are the computers for the Leica X-U? Nikon AW-1 springs to mind. It has underwater capability  -- "waterproof to 49 feet [15m] without a bulky protective housing" -- and it even has interchangeable lenses. And it's a lot cheaper. Sensor size is smaller, though. IQ? With Leica X products that seems to be the overriding point of difference. Any other ruggedized all-weather cameras come close? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used Oly EM5 and EM1 in heavy rain. Since I also own a X2 (which I like a lot and prefer over the X 113 because of size) I would say the IQ of the Oly is good.

The Oly is much lower price, faster AF, more flexible lens for outdoor use, EVF, Sensor stabi,....

If you want to go diving you can put it in a real UW case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An all-weather,shock-proof freeze-proof, waterproof, crush-proof camera certainly holds some appeal. Especially if you like going taking photos in the outdoors. So how will the XU compare?

 

More will be known once snappers can actually get their hands on it, but as the market stands right now (January 2016), who are the computers for the Leica X-U? Nikon AW-1 springs to mind. It has underwater capability  -- "waterproof to 49 feet [15m] without a bulky protective housing" -- and it even has interchangeable lenses. And it's a lot cheaper. Sensor size is smaller, though. IQ? With Leica X products that seems to be the overriding point of difference. Any other ruggedized all-weather cameras come close? 

David,

 

Most competitors have small sensors. The Nikon had a lot of DUW (death under water) reports after it came out.

It's always compromises. And frankly, no underwater afficionado complains about bulk and weight of their camera in a housing.

Only above water :)

 

But the XU at 3300 EUR here? The flash must be on underwater to trigger other flashes, so backscatter will make it useless.

A video light would do better, as Jaap already wrote.

 

DOA I think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 And frankly, no underwater afficionado complains about bulk and weight of their camera in a housing. Only above water :)

Yes, mine weighs about 10Kg above water but is roughly neutral underwater. The basic problem with the X-U is price as far as I can see. Good idea but just way too pricey. I like the spec but .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...