pico Posted November 20, 2015 Share #1 Posted November 20, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) http://www.engadget.com/2015/11/19/reuters-no-longer-accepts-raw-images/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 20, 2015 Posted November 20, 2015 Hi pico, Take a look here Reuters no longer accepts RAW images. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Jeffry Abt Posted November 21, 2015 Share #2 Posted November 21, 2015 Interesting...thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted November 22, 2015 Share #3 Posted November 22, 2015 Lots of tweaking can be made on OOC jpegs saved as tif files so i'm not sure to understand this decision. I'd rather require each pic file to be accompanied by its OOC jpeg but i am not Reuters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Poole Posted November 22, 2015 Share #4 Posted November 22, 2015 I understand their argument over speed. Trying to encourage s quicker workflow for on the scene reporters but their argument over ethics seems to be a bit confused. They aren't saying don't edit, just don't edit the RAW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.