dkCambridgeshire Posted November 11, 2015 Share #141 Posted November 11, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Has anyone tried the 21-35R with the SL and if so do you have any sample images? Thanks dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 11, 2015 Posted November 11, 2015 Hi dkCambridgeshire, Take a look here Would you prefer an R10 over SL?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
IkarusJohn Posted November 11, 2015 Share #142 Posted November 11, 2015 We will never ever have a smart adapter for R lenses, too complicated for a small market. I suspect Leica has pretty accurate records of the numbers of ROM R lenses, both new and retrofitted. They're going to the effort of producing an adapter, I hope you're wrong about it having a reader for the ROM. I do do agree the aperture stop down is unlikely. Leica would never do that. For the simple reason that they cannot service R lenses fully any more, nor do they have the tooling to produce new ones or new spare parts. One cannot sell a body and be unable to produce or give service on the lenses. Im not sure what you mean by fully service Jaap. I have an R lens in Wetzlar for CLA and they have said they can replace lens elements if needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted November 11, 2015 Share #143 Posted November 11, 2015 Has anyone tried the 21-35R with the SL and if so do you have any sample images? Thanks dunk Not I Dunk I sold mine when I was disappointed with it's performance on the M240. . . . The WATE on the other hand is a cracker on the SL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gpwhite Posted November 11, 2015 Share #144 Posted November 11, 2015 Not I Dunk I sold mine when I was disappointed with it's performance on the M240. . . . The WATE on the other hand is a cracker on the SL Oh, Jono, you might have cost me $$ here... I use the WATE @ 16mm f/4.8, mostly. So, are you saying from your experience that the WATE is nearly as good (or even essentially equal considering near-open aperture usage) on SL as the M240? I am not corner pixel peaking here, just asking, one 28 Summilux fan to another, if you are very well satisfied with WATE on SL? I find that the RF precision in focusing for the WATE is quite superior to the EVF2, but I have never seen or used the SL, of course. Thx Jono. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.