Jump to content

2.0/5cm Summitar - open thread


MarkP

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Great pictures Mark.

 

Now all you need to do is amaze yourself with the bokeh wide open, no need to lick a toad or pop a tab of LSD to get the same effect ;)

 

Steve

This lens produces some of the most amazing bokeh ever! It even made me depart with my f1 Noctilux as I had this as a backup to satisfy my swirly, painterly bokeh craving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to yank the Summitar off of the IIIa for a few days...and put it on the M Monochrom. I have the color filters for it.

 

For Swirly Bokeh, the 5cm F1.5 Xenon and Summarit- even more swirls than the Summitar.

 

The Minolta 5cm F2 (Leica thread mount, early 1950s) is one of the few, perhaps the only, lens with the same formula as the Summitar. The Minolta uses easy to find 43mm filters, is hard coated, and in Rigid mount. I need to do a comparison between the two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one TGP

 

 

M240 2.0/5cm Summitar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have this lens.

 

I am of 2 minds about the bokeh. In tight, closer situations and lower light it is fine. 

 

But, on wider scenes with distant OOF areas and broad daylight - as Mark's image above I think illustrates - I find the bokeh harsh and jarring. The visual equivalent of a shrill cacophony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have this lens.

 

I am of 2 minds about the bokeh. In tight, closer situations and lower light it is fine. 

 

But, on wider scenes with distant OOF areas and broad daylight - as Mark's image above I think illustrates - I find the bokeh harsh and jarring. The visual equivalent of a shrill cacophony.

 

I agree with you but OOF foliage in particular challenges many lenses.

I think for larger OOF areas it's OK (see THPs post #23 above) but it struggles with softer definition of small details.  A 1.0/50 Noctilux it is not!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...