Schrödinger's cat Posted September 17, 2015 Share #1 Posted September 17, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Cppied from the FAQ: "Question: How do I correct red edge in Capture 1 pro?(Courtesy of Swamiji)Answer:First shoot an image with the lens in approximately the same circumstances as you wish to correct with something white opaque (I use a bit of white foam, but one can use white opaque glass, a white lid of a tin, even a sheet of white paper) but not an Expodisk." What causes the Expodisk to be unsuitable? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 17, 2015 Posted September 17, 2015 Hi Schrödinger's cat, Take a look here Expodisk and red edges. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted September 17, 2015 Share #2 Posted September 17, 2015 Possibly the prism structure? Just guessing. I never tried, as I find a folded piece of paper easier. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pop Posted September 18, 2015 Share #3 Posted September 18, 2015 The Expodisk appears to have a black rim which might make more difficult the detection of the red edges, I could imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schrödinger's cat Posted September 19, 2015 Author Share #4 Posted September 19, 2015 Possibly the prism structure? Just guessing. I never tried, as I find a folded piece of paper easier. I thought that sounded like a good explanation, but when holding the Expodisk up to a bright light, the opaque white plastic prevents seeing the prisms from the lens side. This is sort of an academic interest, since I generally use a coffee filter myself (Granted, since it's a Leica, I use a Marks and Spencer coffee filter, but still..... ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schrödinger's cat Posted September 19, 2015 Author Share #5 Posted September 19, 2015 The Expodisk appears to have a black rim which might make more difficult the detection of the red edges, I could imagine. That sounded to me like a good theory, but with the lenses I tried the black rim cannot be seen by the lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
new2leica Posted September 27, 2015 Share #6 Posted September 27, 2015 An Expodisc is not opaque. It is semi opaque allowing 18% light transmission. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schrödinger's cat Posted September 27, 2015 Author Share #7 Posted September 27, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) An Expodisc is not opaque. It is semi opaque allowing 18% light transmission. It is. However, how does that make it unsuitable for the process of correcting red edges? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
new2leica Posted September 27, 2015 Share #8 Posted September 27, 2015 The FAQ's answer states to use something that is white opaque. An Expodisk is not. See http://blog.phaseone.com/get-perfect-snow-without-color-cast/ Scroll down to where a reference file is created for color correction. If an Expodisk is used the image won't have the necessary 'whiteness' instead it will be 18% grey. So I would infer that is the reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schrödinger's cat Posted September 28, 2015 Author Share #9 Posted September 28, 2015 If an Expodisk is used the image won't have the necessary 'whiteness' instead it will be 18% grey. Ah. That simply never occurred to me, but it sounds like the perfectly obvious explanation. However, in reading the article at the link you posted, the author states : "Hi Robert, Yes, an ExpoDisc should work. All the best, Niels" I gotta admit though, I find your line of reasoning is compelling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 28, 2015 Share #10 Posted September 28, 2015 What is the difference between white and grey? Only the exposure, the colour channels are balanced in both cases. The camera will expose the both differently to render the same density. Shooting through white paper and an expodisk should produce exactly the same file if the camera is on "A". So that cannot be a reason not to use it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted September 28, 2015 Share #11 Posted September 28, 2015 Ah. That simply never occurred to me, but it sounds like the perfectly obvious explanation. However, in reading the article at the link you posted, the author states : "Hi Robert, Yes, an ExpoDisc should work. All the best, Niels" I gotta admit though, I find your line of reasoning is compelling. I'd say that in practice the expodisc, though not "white", works rather fine, considering that its "greyness" is uniform and not biased to some color , which would alter the real red shift at the edges. Anyway, a normal A3 white matte sheet is imho the simplest tool .. and the lightining of it is more important than the "purity" of its white. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted September 28, 2015 Share #12 Posted September 28, 2015 What is the difference between white and grey? Only the exposure, the colour channels are balanced in both cases. The camera will expose the both differently to render the same density. Shooting through white paper and an expodisk should produce exactly the same file if the camera is on "A". So that cannot be a reason not to use it. Indeed an 18% grey is perfectly suited for white balance, better than white in fact. If the image appears white rather grey, some RGB channel may be clipped, skewing the WB result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.