mjh Posted October 15, 2015 Share #101  Posted October 15, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) I just hope the TL 35mm isn't too large/heavy or that there's a T-specific smaller lighter 35mm! That’s assuming there was a difference between T and TL. But is there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 15, 2015 Posted October 15, 2015 Hi mjh, Take a look here Is Leica T headed for discontinuation?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
AndreasAM Posted October 15, 2015 Share #102  Posted October 15, 2015 That’s assuming there was a difference between T and TL. But is there?   Well let's repeat myself, since you are doing fine this way.  "You tell me.........  But just naming them different, for the sake of it, is beyond my True Logic" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 15, 2015 Share #103  Posted October 15, 2015 But just naming them different, for the sake of it, is beyond my True Logic" When Michelle LaVaughn Robinson became Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, how much did she change? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreasAM Posted October 15, 2015 Share #104 Â Posted October 15, 2015 When Michelle LaVaughn Robinson became Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, how much did she change? Â Â You really have to ask her, but I imagine a lot. Let's say, not so much in appearance, although she dresses nicer, but because she stopped being a lawyer in her own right, for the time being, and went on to become the "first lady", co-existing beside Barack. Â So in your analogy, I assume the T-lens stops being an independent lens for the T-system and will morph into the L-mount lens, co-existing for two systems; the T and S, APS-C and FF. Â Now, my question is if the TL-primes, or SL-primes for that matter, dresses nicer, i.e. will have a distance scale and a true MF-ring, accompanied by a macro-switch, just like the Q-lens? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-photo Posted October 15, 2015 Share #105 Â Posted October 15, 2015 interesting! Now T and TL would be same thing, I wonder if existing T lenses would work on SL, or do they have to be TL (manufactured after October)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 15, 2015 Share #106 Â Posted October 15, 2015 As we have seen from the A7 there is no such thing as a small AF FF f1.4 lens, whatever the register distance or size of the camera. It's physics. Â Leica M is, and will be, the smallest FF lens forever. Due to the non-telecentric (most lenses, although some Zeiss and long focal are) and purely manual design. It has not one infantessimal thing to do with physics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 15, 2015 Share #107  Posted October 15, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) I wonder if existing T lenses would work on SL, or do they have to be TL (manufactured after October)? What’s in a name? A rose by any other name … etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbealnz Posted October 15, 2015 Share #108 Â Posted October 15, 2015 Too much wild speculation, fueled by some well appointed teasers (yes, you Michael). Just sit tight and wait. Gary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBHewee Posted October 20, 2015 Share #109 Â Posted October 20, 2015 I'm guessing that we new T lenses being confirmed, we can comfortably say that the T as a family is being kept by Leica? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreasAM Posted October 20, 2015 Share #110  Posted October 20, 2015 I'm guessing that we new T lenses being confirmed, we can comfortably say that the T as a family is being kept by Leica?  They are confirmed yes, but for next year! It takes far too long.  Only one prime available now, the 35 Lux not before summer 2016 and the 60 Macro at the end of 2016. Guess I won't see a (S) Wide Lens before 2017.  I really have to think hard about staying in the T-system, at this pace. This way the T is becoming a point and shoot with only the 23 mm. Summicron. Nice replacement for my X1, but still. But not wanting to leave Leica means trading up to a M, let alone SL (I do have a range of R-lenses).  Will have to count my pennies again...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bencoyote Posted October 21, 2015 Share #111 Â Posted October 21, 2015 interesting! Now T and TL would be same thing, I wonder if existing T lenses would work on SL, or do they have to be TL (manufactured after October)? One of the reviewers used T lenses for much of his review period. So yeah they work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 22, 2015 Share #112  Posted October 22, 2015 While I don’t think existing lenses will be renamed ‘TL’ retroactively, for all intents and purposes a T lens is a TL lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belle123 Posted October 22, 2015 Share #113  Posted October 22, 2015 While I don’t think existing lenses will be renamed ‘TL’ retroactively, for all intents and purposes a T lens is a TL lens. Michael, are the new TL lenses announced full framed or cropped? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 22, 2015 Share #114 Â Posted October 22, 2015 Michael, are the new TL lenses announced full framed or cropped? TL lenses are designed for APS-C; on the SL they will switch the camera into crop mode automatically. Just as existing T lenses do. T = TL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belle123 Posted October 22, 2015 Share #115 Â Posted October 22, 2015 TL lenses are designed for APS-C; on the SL they will switch the camera into crop mode automatically. Just as existing T lenses do. T = TL. So, if I read correctly, they will only produce a 10mp image on the SL? Â Why would I buy them for the SL? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 22, 2015 Share #116  Posted October 22, 2015 So, if I read correctly, they will only produce a 10mp image on the SL?  Why would I buy them for the SL? You wouldn’t. Nobody in his or her right mind would consider buying T/TL lenses for using these exclusively on the SL. But if you or a family member should own a T that would be a different matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted October 22, 2015 Share #117 Â Posted October 22, 2015 So, if I read correctly, they will only produce a 10mp image on the SL? Â Why would I buy them for the SL? Â The 35/F1.4 might make a reasonably useful (almost certainly cheaper) stop-gap fast AF '50' for the SL system if it appears much in advance of the SL 50 lens (both seem to be timetabled for sometime later next year). 10MP is perfectly fine in many situations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belle123 Posted October 22, 2015 Share #118  Posted October 22, 2015 You wouldn’t. Nobody in his or her right mind would consider buying T/TL lenses for using these exclusively on the SL. But if you or a family member should own a T that would be a different matter. Well, I am glad they are continuing the strong support for the T with new lenses.  That is good news.  I am wondering if these lenses will, in the future, work on a higher resolution sensor.....perhaps a new T? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert blu Posted October 22, 2015 Share #119  Posted October 22, 2015 Hopefully this 35/1,4 will be not too large and heavy and will be available early on the market. Any news about new firmware updating? robert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 22, 2015 Share #120  Posted October 22, 2015 I am wondering if these lenses will, in the future, work on a higher resolution sensor.....perhaps a new T? Sure they will. And I suppose there will be a next T – photokina 2016 could provide the opportunity to announce it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.