rramesh Posted December 31, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted December 31, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am looking for a relatively inexpensive 35 lens that performs well in low light situations and renders a nice bokeh. I am contemplating either the CV 35 Nokton 1.2 (cheap when purchased used) or the new Ultron 1.7 but I have not seen it in the shops yet. Â Any thoughts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 31, 2014 Posted December 31, 2014 Hi rramesh, Take a look here Voigtlander fast 35. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jdlaing Posted December 31, 2014 Share #2  Posted December 31, 2014 I am looking for a relatively inexpensive 35 lens that performs well in low light situations and renders a nice bokeh. I am contemplating either the CV 35 Nokton 1.2 (cheap when purchased used) or the new Ultron 1.7 but I have not seen it in the shops yet. Any thoughts?  I'm waiting to see the Ultron myself. Looks like Spring 2015 for release. If the quality is anything like the new 50 Nokton 1.5 it will be a great lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wosim Posted December 31, 2014 Share #3  Posted December 31, 2014 If you like, have a look here: https://sites.google.com/site/wosimsphotography/links-testberichte-reviews/testberichte-objektive-leica-lens-reviews-28mm-35mm  You will find reviews of those lenses, I collected in recent years. Maybe these links are helpful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted January 17, 2015 Author Share #4 Â Posted January 17, 2015 Just bought a CV 35 1.2 II. So far the results have been promising. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonel Posted January 18, 2015 Share #5  Posted January 18, 2015 Just bought a CV 35 1.2 II. So far the results have been promising.  It's an exceptional lens  Enjoy  A few with a M240   A jog before sunset   Fag break Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.liam Posted January 18, 2015 Share #6 Â Posted January 18, 2015 Colonel, these are undoubtedly shot stopped down, the first showing quite a bit of distortion. Given the size and weight, this isn't a lens I'd shoot at anything but wide open or nearly so. Â If it's not a bother, mind posting anything at Æ’/1.2-2? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonel Posted January 18, 2015 Share #7 Â Posted January 18, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Colonel, these are undoubtedly shot stopped down, the first showing quite a bit of distortion. Given the size and weight, this isn't a lens I'd shoot at anything but wide open or nearly so. Â If it's not a bother, mind posting anything at Æ’/1.2-2? Thanks. Â Actually I thought the first had very little distortion considering I didn't use the correction on lightroom. I don't find the weight much at all, on a M7 or M240 but I guess that's compared to the DSLRs I had or the A7S's lenses. Â This is f5.6 on the M240, focused 1/6 down the tunnel. It's amazingly sharp at the pixel level, might post a blow up later: Â Â This is f2 or f1.4 on M7: Â Â This is f1.2 or f1.4 on M7: Â Â And lastly another wide open on the M7, just to show the versatility of the lens and the low distortion. I used it for a whole holiday: Â Â I didn't use lightroom correction with any of the above. Â Best rgds Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 18, 2015 Share #8  Posted January 18, 2015 Colonel, these are undoubtedly shot stopped down, the first showing quite a bit of distortion. Given the size and weight, this isn't a lens I'd shoot at anything but wide open or nearly so.  If it's not a bother, mind posting anything at ƒ/1.2-2? Thanks.  Aren’t you confusing perspective with distortion here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonel Posted January 18, 2015 Share #9 Â Posted January 18, 2015 Another one at f1.4 today: Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.