stickan1 Posted December 8, 2014 Share #1 Posted December 8, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I spend a lot of time photographing outdoors and sometimes in bad weather. I don't trust the weather sealing on the M240. I have tested it in bad weather, it survived, but I got humidity in the rangefinder. I would also like to have macro and tele availabilities. I had a Nikon D800E for two years but I didn't like the weight that I had to carry with me. So I am considering the Olympus Em-1 with the two pro lenses 12-40/2.8 and 40-150/2.8 Has anybody else walked this path? Any experiences? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 8, 2014 Posted December 8, 2014 Hi stickan1, Take a look here Olympus OMD EM-1 as a complement. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
k-hawinkler Posted December 8, 2014 Share #2 Posted December 8, 2014 I spend a lot of time photographing outdoors and sometimes in bad weather. I don't trust the weather sealing on the M240. I have tested it in bad weather, it survived, but I got humidity in the rangefinder. I would also like to have macro and tele availabilities. I had a Nikon D800E for two years but I didn't like the weight that I had to carry with me. So I am considering the Olympus Em-1 with the two pro lenses 12-40/2.8 and 40-150/2.8 Has anybody else walked this path? Any experiences? Stig, Excellent choice. I have the E-M1 and 12-40/2.8. Really great combination. Jono Slack just started a thread on getdpi with images from the 40-150/2.8 lens. Very impressive indeed. Fun with the Zuiko 40-150 f2.8 - The GetDPI Photography Forums Also, the 5-axis IBIS works miracles, including with your Leica lenses, including the WATE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanyasi Posted December 8, 2014 Share #3 Posted December 8, 2014 I own it. I am not a huge fan, but the files are excellent and the build quality is excellent. My objections are typical. I don't like the button positions and the menu system is too complicated and involved for me. Specifically, I find the buttons that set the focus point on the grid are difficult to find by touch. I don't have that problem with my DSLR. My other major objection is file size. I do crop and find on occasion that my ability to print photos at my desired size is problematic. I should say, I did buy the adapter that permits me to use Leica lenses. I used it a couple of times, but focusing just wasn't working for me. My long-term plan: When we start to see full-frame/larger pixel cameras in this category, I will probably buy one. I'll then convert the OMD into an infrared camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted December 8, 2014 Share #4 Posted December 8, 2014 Sony A7 II? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted December 10, 2014 Share #5 Posted December 10, 2014 I don't think you would be disappointed with the Olympus. Both Olympus and Panasonic produce some astonishing lenses of their own, plus the Leica designed lenses made by Panasonic. Image quality is great and if you feel the need to crop buy a longer lens instead. Weather sealing is often demonstrated in You Tube clips showing the camera being drenched in beer or held under the shower. But regarding your M240 steaming up, it should only happen if you use your warm hand to cover it after it gets wet, or putting it under your coat. Try keeping it cold and wet by putting it into a cold camera bag, keep your camera in the boot of the car etc. and carry a small bar towel to give it a quick rub dry every now and again. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xalo Posted December 10, 2014 Share #6 Posted December 10, 2014 Hi Stig, Earlier this year, a local store borrowed me an OM-D E-1 for a weekend through the Olympus trial programme. I tried none of the recent zooms because only the older 12-50 was available, but the quite good 17mm ƒ1,8 came along; no adapter for my 4/3 swd zooms 12-60 and 50-200, either, unfortunately. I like 4/3 since I started with an E-330 and the E-3 remains also one of my current digitial "R-solutions". It has been totally reliable in every wheather, with the exception of a very cold day and a half empty, third party battery, when it froze. While the form factor of the OM-D E-1 is great and the screen is superb, I'm with sanyasi on the buttons: I find the ergonomics terrible. Perhaps I could get used to it, but I cannot (or do not want to) get over the electronic viewfinder, which certainly is good for what it is. Image quality was very good for the small sensor (no surprise), but I felt that the OOC jpegs were over processed; the native lens seemed to receive a lot of electronic support, erasing any personality (for lack of a better word). Surely this can be tweaked; also, I had no software to treat the raws. In the end, I find the concept less inspiring than RF or SLR, but if the EVF does not bother you and raw it your way, it may well be what you are looking for. Alexander Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted December 10, 2014 Share #7 Posted December 10, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Did you try to switch off some of the in camera processing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xalo Posted December 10, 2014 Share #8 Posted December 10, 2014 No, I did not but am quite certain that the output can be improved to become very good even straight from jpeg. It is more that the camera did not make me want to try. I found that it lacked the appeal of simplicity, from buttons to menu to the frills of the EVF and down to the most sophisticated (and quite successful) attempt to crank the ultimate image quality out of the tiny chip... If I were in the market for a highly efficient and portable all-options camera, it could well be this one. As it stands, I just bought a bargain Summilux 25mm for my E-3... Alexander Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted December 10, 2014 Share #9 Posted December 10, 2014 I'm not sure about the confusing buttons, it seems like there has been a logical progression since the original E-1 in that anybody transported by a time machine from that era could recognise an Olympus button layout and menu and find their way around it. But I have no idea how to find my way around a Fuji camera and find it illogical and baffling. In any case I'm not the best person to ask because I like to keep a camera simple and would rarely use some of the amazing functions so never look in those menu's or press those buttons. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickan1 Posted December 10, 2014 Author Share #10 Posted December 10, 2014 I am on my way home with an Omd E-1, grip, extra battery, 12-40/2,8, 17/1,8, 40-150/2,8. I hope it was the right decision! We'll see in a couple of days. I only use RAW and manual mode so the buttons is no problem for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted December 11, 2014 Share #11 Posted December 11, 2014 Congratulations! I am looking forward to also see your images with a Leica lens on this camera. Here is one of mine on E-M5. Handheld, 1/3s, OOC JPG, shot with Leica WATE 16-18-21/4 M lens. With E-M1 will be similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanyasi Posted December 11, 2014 Share #12 Posted December 11, 2014 Congratulations on your purchase. Hope you enjoy it. Just to clarify the buttons. The button I am referring to is the one that you use to set the focus point on the grid. I don't have large hands, but I find it difficult to hit the button and then move the focus point without actually looking at the back of the camera. If you are shooting with Leica lenses rather than Olympus ones, this won't be an issue. The lever system for switching between iso/white balance and aperture/shutter speed is clever. I prefer a simpler approach, however. Just my opinion based on my use. By the way, I shoot only in manual mode--no aperture or shutter priority. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted December 11, 2014 Share #13 Posted December 11, 2014 A review of the 40-150 here The Olympus 40 - 150mm Lens Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xalo Posted December 11, 2014 Share #14 Posted December 11, 2014 Stig, wish that this set up at least meets your expectations! I know that the SWD zooms some years back were quite a revelation to me (coming from Canon mid-range SLR gear). As to the Olympus button layout, I find it cumbersome already on the E-3: the two-button combinations in particular; positioning of AE lock as well; and certainly in comparison with the Eos 5D. Perhaps I was just unwilling to learn, as well, because I really miss the optical viewfinder on the OM-D series (also briefly tried the E-M5). Had hoped that Olympus would come up with a downsized SLR with better IQ (dynamic range and high iso) and a big prism — a 'true' digital OM. Will see if I get into the current line one day. FWIW, the venerable D Summilux 25mm has arrived and is quite what I expected. Chunky, bright, smooth and sharp. Will post when I got something worthwhile. Alexander Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickan1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share #15 Posted December 11, 2014 I think it was the right choice for me. I have been out a couple of hours today and has set up the camera but there are things that I will fine tune later. One thing that impressed me was the IBIS. It is very effective. I got fine results at shutter speeds as low as 1/13 with the 40-150 lens. The files are fine but they lack the richness from Leica, but it was a very grey day so it is not easy to judge. But I did not expect it to be on the same level as Leica anyway. My idea was to have a light second system that is truly weather sealed that give ok files. I think it delivers that and it also gives shorter focus distance and longer lenses. I don't plan to buy an adapter for my M lenses as I have both the MM and M240. This will continue to be my main tools and I like the manual handling of the Leica. But A mode and autofocus simplifies and there are situations when it is the better choice. But it is less of a challenge and in the long run less fun I think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londonmember Posted December 13, 2014 Share #16 Posted December 13, 2014 My wife has a OMD EM-5 with 12,17,45 lenses. Nice. I like the small camera and the small light primes. I tried an EM-1 for a bit but didn't get on with the files. Hard to describe, but they just seemed a little 'flat' compared with FF. I also use a 35mm most of the time, and the 17.5 isn't good enough IMHO. I've just got a used Sony RX1. Output is great. Not a lot to choose between it and the M240 with 35 Lux, although obviously its AF with a slot on EVF rather than a RF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickan1 Posted December 13, 2014 Author Share #17 Posted December 13, 2014 I agree about the "flatness", I have made some comparisons with my MM with the same scene. But that was expected. The EM-1 is not an alternative to my Leicas, only a complement sometimes when I want more rugged gear or traveling light or macro or longer lenses. But I have had Leicas for four years and learned to live within its limits but now I wanted to have the chance to go outside these limits sometimes. I decided to go for the PRO zooms and they are really good, I haven't used zooms for many years but I can't deny that they make life easier. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted December 13, 2014 Share #18 Posted December 13, 2014 I agree about the "flatness", I have made some comparisons with my MM with the same scene. But that was expected. The EM-1 is not an alternative to my Leicas, only a complement sometimes when I want more rugged gear or traveling light or macro or longer lenses. But I have had Leicas for four years and learned to live within its limits but now I wanted to have the chance to go outside these limits sometimes. I decided to go for the PRO zooms and they are really good, I haven't used zooms for many years but I can't deny that they make life easier. A wise choice. I'm sure you'll like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted December 16, 2014 Share #19 Posted December 16, 2014 So I am considering the Olympus OM-D E-M1 with the two Pro lenses 12-40/2.8 and 40-150/2.8 Has anybody else walked this path? I have. Highly recommended. 'nuff said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.