A miller Posted January 1, 2015 Share #21 Posted January 1, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Understood. We have to keep in mind, though, that actual analog prints will always produce a much finer grain. While I scanned the negative at 4000 dpi and produced a 150mb or so tiff file, there invariably are some digital artifacts that can't easily be removed or masked. I have been very impressed at the prints from the lab from this film as well as the 800T, and would encourage others to try this as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 1, 2015 Posted January 1, 2015 Hi A miller, Take a look here New Film From CineStill - CineStill 50Daylight Xpro C41. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Stealth3kpl Posted January 1, 2015 Author Share #22 Posted January 1, 2015 And the examples shown on the website could be more compelling, IMO. Adam That lens seems remarkable. I wonder how my modern 50 summicron compares (last pre apo design). If you haven't already, you might like to submit your images to the cinestill film site. Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted January 1, 2015 Share #23 Posted January 1, 2015 Hi Pete - I'm sure your 50 cron will render beautifully as well. The DR cron is really wonderful, and now that I have gone almost entirely to film I find myself using it a lot more than the 50 summilux aspherical, which i know is strange. Not to take anything away from the film, though, which is very good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted January 1, 2015 Share #24 Posted January 1, 2015 Hey Adam -- Great shots! Ordering the film today. Like the turkey shot -- having seen the picture pf you taking it in the other thread. Happy New Year! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plasticman Posted January 1, 2015 Share #25 Posted January 1, 2015 Understood. We have to keep in mind, though, that actual analog prints will always produce a much finer grain. While I scanned the negative at 4000 dpi and produced a 150mb or so tiff file, there invariably are some digital artifacts that can't easily be removed or masked. I have been very impressed at the prints from the lab from this film as well as the 800T, and would encourage others to try this as well. While this is true, I actually like the accentuated grain that comes from the scanning process - it can be a little 'dreamy' in comparison to the super-smooth lab prints. I really like your images - you have a great eye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted January 1, 2015 Share #26 Posted January 1, 2015 Steve - Thanks a lot. While I'm sure there is plenty of film to go around, I did make sure that I ordered another 5 rolls before posting these images :D Plasticman - Many thanks and I don't disagree with you about the accentuated grain, particularly with regard to some B&W films, such as Ilford HP5; here's an example of what I mean (from a morning last week just before dawn): Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! The accentuated grain provides a dreamy, almost foggy look, even though there wasn't any fog at all. Just a cloudy cold morning not worth waking up at 6am on a vacation week Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! The accentuated grain provides a dreamy, almost foggy look, even though there wasn't any fog at all. Just a cloudy cold morning not worth waking up at 6am on a vacation week ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/237604-new-film-from-cinestill-cinestill-50daylight-xpro-c41/?do=findComment&comment=2739404'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.