pop Posted November 25, 2014 Share #21 Posted November 25, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I tried to preset the distance and then wait until the subject moved to that distance For parades and biking races I focus on some easily discernible lines or cracks on the ground and wait until the victim is there. Rather, nearly there, just so that the victim will be there when the shutter is open. If the ground does not offer any suitable features, there might be flags, railings, their shadows or anything at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Hi pop, Take a look here Manual Focusing RF vs EVF. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Exodies Posted November 29, 2014 Share #22 Posted November 29, 2014 I'm surprised I focus anything. I have Zeiss butterfly lenses in my eyeballs configured so that I can see clearly to read. I use progressive lenses in my spectacles but prefer to take them off when using the camera. I use a diopter correction lens and the range finder all the time with 35 and 50mm. My spectacles prescription is -2 and I use a -2 diopter correction. My 90mm lens needs a different approach. In bright light, the 1.4x magnifier (with diopter) works better on the 90, but makes the 35 and 50 harder to focus. In low light the EVF and 5x magnification and focus peaking make the 90 useable. As for moving subjects, a sock filled with ball bearings should be used to stun them before attempting to take their photo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Livingston Posted November 29, 2014 Share #23 Posted November 29, 2014 As for moving subjects, a sock filled with ball bearings should be used to stun them before attempting to take their photo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Z. Goriup Posted December 3, 2014 Share #24 Posted December 3, 2014 I'm surprised I focus anything. I have Zeiss butterfly lenses in my eyeballs configured so that I can see clearly to read. I use progressive lenses in my spectacles but prefer to take them off when using the camera. I use a diopter correction lens and the range finder all the time with 35 and 50mm. My spectacles prescription is -2 and I use a -2 diopter correction. My 90mm lens needs a different approach. In bright light, the 1.4x magnifier (with diopter) works better on the 90, but makes the 35 and 50 harder to focus. In low light the EVF and 5x magnification and focus peaking make the 90 useable. As for moving subjects, a sock filled with ball bearings should be used to stun them before attempting to take their photo. I wear specs as well, but ABSOLUTELY NEVER DURING FOCUSING or when I'm looking through the RF, and after long experimentation have finally arrived at the ideal set-up ( for me ): a x1.25 magnifier and a 3.0 diopter. This arrangement works beautifully with all my lenses ( 21mm to 90mm ) but, the big problem is that the magnifer is not threaded, and makes the diopter fall out since it's merely "screwed" into the rubber collar on the magnifier. Obviously Wetzlar never ikntended for the magnifier to accept the diopter. I've lost several this way, and at $100 +per, it's getting expensive and more than mildly annoying. I've asked many times why the magnifiers are not threaded to accept diopters, but so far have not received an answer I thought was sound and reasonable. I suspect that optical degredation when using both exceeds Leica's limits and this is a way to prevent "stacking" two incompatable items. I'd love to read jaap's comments to once and for all shed some light on this issue, since I cant belive I'm the first to try the 'stacking' and loosing a few hundred $ of diopters in the process Care to share how you manage to keep the diopter in the magnifier without it falling out ??? Thank you, JZG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted December 3, 2014 Share #25 Posted December 3, 2014 ...but, the big problem is that the magnifer is not threaded The Leica brand 1.25 magnifier is indeed threaded. Mine, which sits in a drawer, is, and the retail ad for it clearly states…"It also has a thread for correction lenses to compensate for vision defects." I get around any issues by simply wearing my glasses, as I have for decades….works fine for me, but everyone has his/her own preferences. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted December 3, 2014 Share #26 Posted December 3, 2014 I wear specs as well, but ABSOLUTELY NEVER DURING FOCUSING or when I'm looking through the RF, ... JZG, In case it's any help, I also use (progressive) specs but instead of using diopters and magnifiers I look through the RF with my specs and use an E-Clypse rubber RF cup and 0.85 demagnifier from Match Technical so that I can see the frame lines and my specs lenses don't get scratched. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vip Posted December 3, 2014 Share #27 Posted December 3, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I think that with wide angle the RF is much better and faster as in the EVF you need use the zoomx10 function to be as precise as RF, but this slow down so much with longer lens as 90 EVF makes the immage so bigger than RF that makes easier and faster to be sure of focusing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted December 3, 2014 Share #28 Posted December 3, 2014 My Leica magnifier is threaded to enable a diopter corrector to be stacked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bocaburger Posted December 4, 2014 Share #29 Posted December 4, 2014 I think that with wide angle the RF is much better and faster as in the EVF you need use the zoomx10 function to be as precise as RF, but this slow down so much with longer lens as 90 EVF makes the immage so bigger than RF that makes easier and faster to be sure of focusing Not sure I understand this. The magnification of a subject is in no way dependent upon the lens selected. All the frame lines do is crop the overall viewfinder image. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
microview Posted December 4, 2014 Share #30 Posted December 4, 2014 Isn't Vip saying that with a 90mm lens the FOV is quite narrow so the enlarged area via EVF zoom seems to be much larger (ie as if you were closer to the object in focus) than with say a 35mm or 50mm lens? And so focusing that way is faster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 4, 2014 Share #31 Posted December 4, 2014 Yes - but one should relate it to the original FOV of the lens, which means the crop is exactly the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.