terence fairweather Posted April 30, 2007 Share #21 Posted April 30, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) As the famous car makers Rolls Royce once said: " The quality will remain long after the price has been forgotten". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 30, 2007 Posted April 30, 2007 Hi terence fairweather, Take a look here M8 -- Shutter Noise FOLLOW-UP. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tom0511 Posted April 30, 2007 Share #22 Posted April 30, 2007 The silent shutter noise was one of the things being promoted (and I think which actually was) one of the big advantages of a Leica M. IMO the M8 does not have this advantage any more. Its now more in the range of SLRs. I miss the silent shutter of film-Ms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted April 30, 2007 Share #23 Posted April 30, 2007 When I started this discussion about shutter noise, I was interested in receiving replies with the emphasis on persuading Solms to take corrective action in response well-reasoned arguments -- and for those of you have been helpful in that regard I am thankful.For the others who would criticize our efforts, it would appear that they misunderstand what I am trying to achieve -- it is not, repeat, not how noisy the shutter is with respect to other cameras, it is that it is noisier than previous models, and, for a $5,000 camera excuses are meaningless. For example, when designing a new version of an existing product, one is entitled to expect that improvements will be made -- not that its main virtue will be disregarded to accommodate the "improvement", as has happened with the M8. Remember, it was only a few years ago that Leica said that you can't have a digital "M", and now here we are. Why, I bet that they can even do a full frame digital. True, perhaps the camera body might have to be a tad deeper, but I doubt anyone would object. Back to basics -- if Leica reverted to the classic cocking of the shutter, as recommended by one of the respondents, might Leica also go back to the cloth shutter, with motor driven mode for sequential sohts? I think that this is all no more complicated than that, and therefore would enlist the support of those in agreement. I would not like to see the cloth shutter return. It was inaccurate beyond 1/250th,it had a ridiculous sync speed and it had only 1000th (approx) which did not help shallow DOF... That kind of nostalgia I can do without. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddawn Posted May 1, 2007 Share #24 Posted May 1, 2007 I would not like to see the cloth shutter return. It was inaccurate beyond 1/250th,it had a ridiculous sync speed and it had only 1000th (approx) which did not help shallow DOF... That kind of nostalgia I can do without. The magic of the cloth shutter is in its whisper quietness and the tactile feel of the camera as that shutter opens and closes when you can actually feel the travel. And with manual cocking, it actually adds a rhythm to the shooting. I know, all these have nothing to do with ultimate picture quality but are intangibles which add to the M experience, or rather, preserves the M experience in a digital M body. The inaccuracy can be solved if the shutter is electronically timed (ala the M7), and 1/1000 will be less painful if they can lower the default ISO speed (to something like 50 maybe?) with a different sensor. As for using flash on a M....... Personally I would take that over the burst / continous mode... guess I'm a traditionalist Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 1, 2007 Share #25 Posted May 1, 2007 The magic of the cloth shutter is in its whisper quietness and the tactile feel of the camera as that shutter opens and closes when you can actually feel the travel. And with manual cocking, it actually adds a rhythm to the shooting. I know, all these have nothing to do with ultimate picture quality but are intangibles which add to the M experience, or rather, preserves the M experience in a digital M body. The inaccuracy can be solved if the shutter is electronically timed (ala the M7), and 1/1000 will be less painful if they can lower the default ISO speed (to something like 50 maybe?) with a different sensor. As for using flash on a M....... Personally I would take that over the burst / continous mode... guess I'm a traditionalist Well. 35 years of M cloth shutters have taken care of my traditionalist needs I guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.