Carduelis Posted May 4, 2014 Share #41 Posted May 4, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I may only consider replacing the X Vario, once I know about the performance characteristics and ergonomics of the roughly equivalent standard zoom and planned effective 80-200 mm focal length zoom. Although I am happy with my X Vario and M240, I sometimes miss not having a long telephoto lens beyond 90 mm focal length. My best ergonomic solution at the moment (for manual focusing and not having image stabilisation) is the Ricoh GXR plus 90 mm thin Tele-Elmarit lens providing an effective focal length of 135 mm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 Hi Carduelis, Take a look here How many will sell theirX-Vario to buy a newT?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
!Nomad64 Posted May 4, 2014 Share #42 Posted May 4, 2014 If anything I'm holding out for an update to the X Vario now that we know they can do better than f6.4 Half a stop more is good but not that great thing. The other interesting part is that now it's 18-56 as opposed to 18-46 of the X Vario and there's a lot less distortion at the wider end. The sad thing is that the goods do not come for free and based on the samples I could find online the 18-56 suffers a bit more in the corners and introduces sensible amounts of CA. Cheers, Bruno Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
!Nomad64 Posted May 4, 2014 Share #43 Posted May 4, 2014 Leica-camera.dk | LEICA X Vario - Lanzarote Thanks, I really enjoyed your album (and persuaded myself a bit more that the XV makes an excellent travel camera). Cheers, Bruno Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynp Posted May 4, 2014 Share #44 Posted May 4, 2014 I have a deal with my wife. I shall be buying us a new T in black and if she likes her, she would take the T over….than she would ( maybe) sell her X-Vario, or maybe not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TW528 Posted May 5, 2014 Share #45 Posted May 5, 2014 Half a stop more is good but not that great thing. The other interesting part is that now it's 18-56 as opposed to 18-46 of the X Vario and there's a lot less distortion at the wider end.The sad thing is that the goods do not come for free and based on the samples I could find online the 18-56 suffers a bit more in the corners and introduces sensible amounts of CA. Cheers, Bruno Every little bit helps and since it would be a fixed lens perhaps it could be further optimized. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonel Posted May 7, 2014 Share #46 Posted May 7, 2014 I find this question a bit of a non-sequitor I remember when the A7 came out, some people said the RX1 was dead. However it thrives, due to its unique combination of size, quality, subtitles and quietness The XV is a different mixture but I believe its sufficiently differentiated from the T to have its own market. Certainly on price, build,shutter and ergonomics, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.