jdlaing Posted October 27, 2013 Share #21 Posted October 27, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Same here. I re-discovered the WATE with the M240. The better high-ISO performance and the EVF greatly extend its usability.Pair it with the MATE and add a 90 of your choice and you've got a great travel kit that covers all your needs. My kit consists of MATE, WATE, 50mm 1.4 and 35mm 1.4 and a 90 Summarit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 27, 2013 Posted October 27, 2013 Hi jdlaing, Take a look here MATES, WATES, and Zooms on the M240. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
algrove Posted October 27, 2013 Share #22 Posted October 27, 2013 Whilst we're on the topic, for those of you who have the WATE and 21-SEM and/or 18-SEM how does the performance of the WATE compare with these fixed focal length lenses?There's certainly not much difference in maximum aperture, and the 21 SEM is a stellar lens but I've never used the WATE. To me the fixed FL's are better. I used to use my 18 all the time until the M came out and I can now use my 15/2.8 R. The SEM21 is probably the best Leica WA available today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted October 28, 2013 Author Share #23 Posted October 28, 2013 To me the fixed FL's are better. I used to use my 18 all the time until the M came out and I can now use my 15/2.8 R. The SEM21 is probably the best Leica WA available today. Thanks. If I bought the WATE I'd still keeping the 21SEM, its the R zoom that would go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted October 28, 2013 Share #24 Posted October 28, 2013 Thanks. If I bought the WATE I'd still keeping the 21SEM, its the R zoom that would go. Probably not a bod choice for you as the WATE can also be used on your Monochrom too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted October 28, 2013 Author Share #25 Posted October 28, 2013 I was wondering about whether I need the Frankenfinder with the WATE on the M240 if I have the EVF. I really like using OVFs, such as my Leica 21mm VF. But then I thought I'll need one for the Monochrom. (?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 28, 2013 Share #26 Posted October 28, 2013 I was wondering about whether I need the Frankenfinder with the WATE on the M240 if I have the EVF. I really like using OVFs, such as my Leica 21mm VF. But then I thought I'll need one for the Monochrom. (?) I'll let you know what I find out tomorrow ....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted October 28, 2013 Author Share #27 Posted October 28, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'll let you know what I find out tomorrow ....... I'll hold my breath with anticipation . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted October 28, 2013 Share #28 Posted October 28, 2013 I was wondering about whether I need the Frankenfinder with the WATE on the M240 if I have the EVF. I really like using OVFs, such as my Leica 21mm VF. But then I thought I'll need one for the Monochrom. (?) No MM here, but FWIW I couldn't be without the Frankenfinder on M8/M9. I'm happy to use only the EVF on the M240, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted October 28, 2013 Author Share #29 Posted October 28, 2013 No MM here, but FWIW I couldn't be without the Frankenfinder on M8/M9. I'm happy to use only the EVF on the M240, though. So I'll need one for the Monochrom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted October 28, 2013 Share #30 Posted October 28, 2013 So I'll need one for the Monochrom. I'd say so. If your work/style does not require very precise composition, you may also use an 18mm finder and estimate the 16 and 21 frame lines. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted October 28, 2013 Share #31 Posted October 28, 2013 Not a real answer for replacing the Frankenfinder with the WATE, but I find from time to time the 21-24-28 finder 12013 comes in very handy on the MM. It is cantered so as to be centered over the M lens axis and it has a hot shoe thumb screw for keeping it attached while taking camera in and out of bag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted October 28, 2013 Share #32 Posted October 28, 2013 Mark, On my M9 I use the Frankenfinder for lenses from 16 to 28 mm. It's wonderful for framing. It also has a bubble in the finder to keep the camera level in landscape orientation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted October 28, 2013 Share #33 Posted October 28, 2013 Mark, On my M9 I use the Frankenfinder for lenses from 16 to 28 mm. It's wonderful for framing. It also has a bubble in the finder to keep the camera level in landscape orientation. Also the parallax adjustment comes in quite handy from time to time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 29, 2013 Share #34 Posted October 29, 2013 I am happy to report you can eliminate the Frankenfinder with the WATE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted October 29, 2013 Share #35 Posted October 29, 2013 I am happy to report you can eliminate the Frankenfinder with the WATE. Do you mean when buying one or using one? We know you can get by without using it on the M240 with EVF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 29, 2013 Share #36 Posted October 29, 2013 Do you mean when buying one or using one? We know you can get by without using it on the M240 with EVF. You don't have to use it. If you need it for other cameras your stuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted October 29, 2013 Author Share #37 Posted October 29, 2013 You don't have to use it.If you need it for other cameras your stuck. Thanks jd but I also still have the Monochrom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.