krabat Posted September 3, 2007 Share #301 Posted September 3, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) .... Oh yes, I am referring to having 16bit DNGs with no "LinearizationTable" metadata as a "user selectable" menu item. .... Yes, THIS would be important, no joke! Regards, Peter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 3, 2007 Posted September 3, 2007 Hi krabat, Take a look here Sign a petition for menu selectable lens profiles. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
hankg Posted September 3, 2007 Author Share #302 Posted September 3, 2007 That certain persons, however important they may be(and to whomever this importance is ascribed), cannot part with their lens(es) for coding is a "corner case" for justification of less accurate, "user selectable" mis-application of firmware functions. I'm using the 50 on paying work right now. It's been shimmed and has focus dead on. If it goes away for 2 weeks and comes back mis calibrated because of the mount change I will be screwed. As this has happened to others I am not going to risk it until I have a suitable back up. It's got nothing to do with being important. Quite the opposite actually. If you were a cab driver could you afford to send your car in for 2 weeks (or maybe much longer if it comes back improperly adjusted) to add some ease of use feature? Explain to me how there is any difference in quality if I select the profile for my Leica 50 Summilux or the camera does it for me as it's the same profile? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.