wattsy Posted September 22, 2016 Share #21441 Posted September 22, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) I want to know if among you , you have some pictures shot with a new Summicron f :2 Asph in comparison with another 35 mm . It seems well to me but I will want to be sure before buying in waiting for the Floating 35 Summilux more expensive. If you have this lens , what is your opinion ? Henry, I have the Summilux FLE and the previous version Summicron ASPH (not the revised 2016 version). The Summilux is superlative and I suspect, by most technical measures, superior to the Summicron. However, as much as I like the Summilux I rarely, if ever now, use it. I simply prefer the balance and size of the Summicron. I find the Summilux just that little bit too large for my taste and, even after 4 years of regular use, the focussing action just that little bit too heavy. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 22, 2016 Posted September 22, 2016 Hi wattsy, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
A miller Posted September 22, 2016 Share #21442 Posted September 22, 2016 Like we are there . Wonderful color and realism Adam It smells drought Adam Best Henry Thanks, Henry. Yes, it was horribly hot and scorching there at that time! In the winter, I understand that this area is often covered with rain water.... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted September 22, 2016 Share #21443 Posted September 22, 2016 35 Summicron ASPH and Portra 400. 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted September 22, 2016 Share #21444 Posted September 22, 2016 Henry, I have the Summilux FLE and the previous version Summicron ASPH (not the revised 2016 version). The Summilux is superlative and I suspect, by most technical measures, superior to the Summicron. However, as much as I like the Summilux I rarely, if ever now, use it. I simply prefer the balance and size of the Summicron. I find the Summilux just that little bit too large for my taste and, even after 4 years of regular use, the focussing action just that little bit too heavy. Henry - for what it is worth, I recently heard from the US rep for Arca Swiss (medium and large format camera company) that lenses have different max focus distance settings for infinity - i.e., infinity is not really what people think it means ("forever"). Lens makers will design their lenses with a different max focus distance (i.e., infinity). I don't know the ins and outs, but the Arca Swiss rep appears to be very familiar with Leica lenses and he said something that makes sense to me, which is the the summicron lenses are designed with a shorter "infinity" max focus distance. This is done in order to optimize the focus throw for street and other shooting at reasonably close distance. This may be relevant to you as I know that you do a fair amount of shooting of landscapes with very long distances. You might want to look into this and try to determine which of the Leica lenses have infinity max focuses that are optimal for landscapes. Having a lens with a relatively "short" infinity seeing may leave you with less than satisfactory tack sharpness at infinity with landscapes... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21445 Posted September 23, 2016 Henry - for what it is worth, I recently heard from the US rep for Arca Swiss (medium and large format camera company) that lenses have different max focus distance settings for infinity - i.e., infinity is not really what people think it means ("forever"). Lens makers will design their lenses with a different max focus distance (i.e., infinity). I don't know the ins and outs, but the Arca Swiss rep appears to be very familiar with Leica lenses and he said something that makes sense to me, which is the the summicron lenses are designed with a shorter "infinity" max focus distance. This is done in order to optimize the focus throw for street and other shooting at reasonably close distance. This may be relevant to you as I know that you do a fair amount of shooting of landscapes with very long distances. You might want to look into this and try to determine which of the Leica lenses have infinity max focuses that are optimal for landscapes. Having a lens with a relatively "short" infinity seeing may leave you with less than satisfactory tack sharpness at infinity with landscapes... interesting, you should start a thread in lenses and see what gets dredged up 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christoph_d Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21446 Posted September 23, 2016 .... angel or fairy ? on the edge of Seine River Paris Sept 2016 Portra 160-M7-35 LA ... Best Henry All these 4 pictures are uncorrected Adam you have changed your avatar isn't ? Henry, I do like the mood in all four, subdued, reserved colours, on the cool side. And the light without too much contrast - works for me. Rgds C. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christoph_d Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21447 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) 35 Summicron ASPH and Portra 400. ... I like this. I can't make my mind up if I would have liked to see more swinging ... or if it is fine as is. Rgds C. Edited September 23, 2016 by christoph_d Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21448 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) From what you tell me this lens would be good for views "near" like the street picture but not for landscapes (but you can do it too because Erwin Puts speaks of good sharpness at f:11 ! ) ... with small loss due to the diffraction at f:16 in the corners. Effectively the center looks sharp at f:2 for near view it'll be good ! Despite this and as Ian said is its lightness which is an asset.It weighs 255 grams with 7 elements in 5 groupsDesigner Peter Karbe Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! from Wiki Leica Forum Thanks Adam , Ian and Christoph for your lighting Best Henry Edited September 23, 2016 by Doc Henry Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! from Wiki Leica Forum Thanks Adam , Ian and Christoph for your lighting Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3117294'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21449 Posted September 23, 2016 Henry, I do like the mood in all four, subdued, reserved colours, on the cool side. And the light without too much contrast - works for me. Rgds C. Thanks Christoph for watching and for your nice comment. I did not have much time in Paris yesterday but I walked a bit to be able to take pictures I'm lucky it was sunny Best Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21450 Posted September 23, 2016 Just a test with Kodak Portra 160 pushed to 400 Isos inside our french National Assembly Kodak Portra 160 > 400 Leica M7 Summilux 35 Asph at f:1.4 no tripod and no flash Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry 9 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3117300'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21451 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) The sharpness in center with Summilux 35 is outstanding I need this sharpness because i focus on hands Fraternal hands of "poilus" * World War 1 Street photos Paris Sept 2016 Kodak Portra160-Leica M7-35 LA Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry * or "hairy" Edited September 23, 2016 by Doc Henry 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry * or "hairy" ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3117305'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21452 Posted September 23, 2016 35 Summicron ASPH and Portra 400. Ian thanks for this picture taken with a 35 Summicron Asph It's a good example of what you said and what Adam said. Nice and lovely picture with beautiful color Best Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21453 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Taken yesterday at Paris developed to day and for Gary Alexandre 3 bridge one of the four pillars of the bridge Sept. 2016 Kodak Portra 160 (C41 38°C) Leica M7 Summilux 35 Asph Image20ptalex3kp160m7fecrlsuplfht+++1000.jpg The Eiffel Tower is just behind Reagrds Henry Here another picture of this pillar with a golden statue This bridge called Alexandre III is built to celebrate the Franco-Russian friendship Kodak Portra 160 M7-35 LA Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Picture uncorrected Best Henry Edited September 23, 2016 by Doc Henry 4 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Picture uncorrected Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3117310'>More sharing options...
janorun974 Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21454 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Jean I find a light blue cast on my Eizo screen I hope you allow me to post this picture corrected below Your opinion ? I have sent you a MP but I have no reply. You have a Imacon and you want to sell in french forum isn't ? You abandon analog ? Best Henry post-50356-0-48858800-1474532452-3.jpg hello Henry no problem my friend your opinion is still interesting, for the blue cast it was the normal colour superia gave me, and I found it adds a drama tonality to the scene... so ... but if You prefer it in yellow cast it's your point of view no problem, concerning my imacon sell, just the same problem, still no job and at one time or another, I need to sell my gear.. believe me I'm crying inside myself sometimes I NEVER STOP USE FILM IF EXIST but I think to do just a break, and thinking to my professionnal future.. not so obsious sometimes. best regards my friend jean Edited September 23, 2016 by janorun974 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21455 Posted September 23, 2016 This picture shows why Summiluxes are useful for film photographers and why the 35 FLE is such an amazing optical achievement. Do you know what photos hang on the back wall, Henry? Just a test with Kodak Portra 160 pushed to 400 Isos inside our french National Assembly Kodak Portra 160 > 400 Leica M7 Summilux 35 Asph at f:1.4 no tripod and no flash Image14colloqkp160m7la35lf+++1000.jpg Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21456 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Cool shades. Madurodam | Flickr 90 Elmarit-M Fomapan 100 in Diafine Edited September 23, 2016 by philipus 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21457 Posted September 23, 2016 This picture shows why Summiluxes are useful for film photographers and why the 35 FLE is such an amazing optical achievement. Do you know what photos hang on the back wall, Henry? It's not a photo Philip, it is the glass pane of the control cabin for the video projector and microphones which is behind. Yes you're right , the Summilux is sometimes useful for this kind of pictures. Thanks for your comment Philip Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21458 Posted September 23, 2016 Cool shades. Madurodam | Flickr 90 Elmarit-M Fomapan 100 in Diafine Philip, I like this picture for the heart shaped glasses of this Muslim lady Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #21459 Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) hello Henry no problem my friend your opinion is still interesting, for the blue cast it was the normal colour superia gave me, and I found it adds a drama tonality to the scene... so ... but if You prefer it in yellow cast it's your point of view no problem, concerning my imacon sell, just the same problem, still no job and at one time or another, I need to sell my gear.. believe me I'm crying inside myself sometimes I NEVER STOP USE FILM IF EXIST but I think to do just a break, and thinking to my professionnal future.. not so obsious sometimes. best regards my friend jean Life is sometimes hard, I understand The Imacon scanner is sublime, not to sell below its rated value Thanks Jean for your reply Stay with us Reunion Island is a nice place and we wait for your pictures Best regards Henry Edited September 23, 2016 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted September 23, 2016 Share #21460 Posted September 23, 2016 From what you tell me this lens would be good for views "near" like the street picture but not for landscapes (but you can do it too because Erwin Puts speaks of good sharpness at f:11 ! ) ... with small loss due to the diffraction at f:16 in the corners. Effectively the center looks sharp at f:2 for near view it'll be good ! Despite this and as Ian said is its lightness which is an asset. It weighs 255 grams with 7 elements in 5 groups Designer Peter Karbe 500px-M-35f2-c.jpg from Wiki Leica Forum Thanks Adam , Ian and Christoph for your lighting Best Henry Henry - I am not sure that just b/c a lens is sharp at f/11 that it necessarily follows that it has relative sharpness at any aperture at the infinity setting for subject that are very far off into the distance. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now