tdavis Posted May 6, 2013 Share #1 Posted May 6, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) For the wiki I've been searching for an image of 16568 UEOOK and found this add: MIL ANUNCIOS.COM - Leica fuelle para Visoflex My question is: which is the UEOOK and what are the others? Thanks, Tim Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/204190-which-one-ueook/?do=findComment&comment=2315526'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Hi tdavis, Take a look here Which one UEOOK?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
chris_livsey Posted May 6, 2013 Share #2 Posted May 6, 2013 Front right is the UEOOK you can, on the original, see the code number clearly, 16568T. Can't commit on the others. Item as posted on e-b*y http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Leica-bellows-for-Visoflex-I-Leitz-codes-UXOOR-UOOYW-UOOVH-UEOOK-16565-/380616722493?pt=ES_Cámaras_de_v%C3%ADdeo&hash=item589e86483d Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted May 6, 2013 Share #3 Posted May 6, 2013 UOOYW at left, UOOVH at center (UOOYW+UOOVH = UOOST), UZEOO shade at right and UXOOR bellows in background: apart UZEOO, which was an addon accessory, the other items wer part of the UXOOR-HE kit. It has been sold at a very good price (for the buyer) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdavis Posted May 6, 2013 Author Share #4 Posted May 6, 2013 No UEOOK or UEOOK lower right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdavis Posted May 6, 2013 Author Share #5 Posted May 6, 2013 OK after rotating 180 and sharpening, I can just make out 16568T Ernst Leitz. Too bad it's such a sorry image. It will do until someone finds a better one. Thanks, Tim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdavis Posted May 6, 2013 Author Share #6 Posted May 6, 2013 Now all we need is a 14071 focusing mount for Elmar 1:4 / 135mm image. Does anyone have one? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted May 6, 2013 Share #7 Posted May 6, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) No UEOOK or UEOOK lower right? Yes... it was already rightly identified by Chris... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted May 6, 2013 Share #8 Posted May 6, 2013 Now all we need is a 14071 focusing mount for Elmar 1:4 / 135mmimage. Does anyone have one? ZOOAN is more common ...and almost identical, but with the "4,5" in the DOF scale... anyway this is a 14071 : Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/204190-which-one-ueook/?do=findComment&comment=2315898'>More sharing options...
tdavis Posted May 7, 2013 Author Share #9 Posted May 7, 2013 Thanks, Chris & Luigi. With your help, our wiki has become more comprehensive. Tim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted May 7, 2013 Share #10 Posted May 7, 2013 Tim, given that seems you are "maintaining" the Wiki... could you correct some wrong pictures ? It's a fine part of our forum and is a pity to have some misleading pictures (I tried to do, but clearly haven't followed correctly the instructions, and didn't suceed... ) Some examples : Visoflex lenses : Telyt 560 5,6 (wrong picture) and Telyt 280 III (not "right" picture) M lenses : Hologon 15 (one pic is a Hologon 16 for Contax - another lens which wasn't listed by Leica) ; Summicron 90 (mismatching between ver. I and II... ver II depicts a very early SOOZI ) ; Super Angulons (not wrong photos... but, curiosly, the protruding back part of the lenses are "cut"....) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_livsey Posted May 7, 2013 Share #11 Posted May 7, 2013 The link to the e-bay auction I gave has a MUCH better photograph. Not sure over the "legality" of using that picture elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.