Jump to content

400mm 6.8 telyt/visoflex


innerimager

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I picked up this most interesting and fun to shoot lens yesterday. A 2 element piece of simplicity with a push/pull focus used with a visoflex. It's most satisfying to shoot, quite light, has a shoulder support as well. And...yes you can get sharp images without AF let alone IS/VR on the M8 with a equivalent 520mm view. This was iso 640, 1/2000, 6.8. best....Peter

original.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I love this lens...;)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

DMR, 6,8/400mm

 

very easy to handle and great performer...

 

regards,

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shots! Really cool. Question: Do you (or does anyone else) have a photo or two of somebody when he or she is using the rig to get shots like these? I've seen images of the rig itself--but not of the rig in use. Thanks --Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Will, (if you meant mine, as Jan's are killer shots aren't they?). Don't have any shots like your asking for, but next time I'm shooting with a buddy I'll get one for you. best...Peter

 

I meant all of the shots in this thread--thanks. That would be great! I'd really like to see what the rig looks like in action! -Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a picture a photographer send me by email. He was watching me doing the birdshots...:D .

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

regards,

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone experience with using a TXBOO extension tube (in place of the Viso) & a Telyt on any M body?

I would imagine it would be near impossible to focus without a Viso

the Viso is a bit of a Rube Goldberg solution and I am amazed at the images Peter and Jan got with theirs ...wonderful clarity

I am curious as to which adapter is needed for the 400 Telyt and also for the 200 Telyt

my local shop has a 200 Telyt in stock at a good price & I just got a Viso III with bellows & the 135 Tele Elmar

I am tempted to expand my Viso experience ...my results so far with macros have been very encouraging

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone experience with using a TXBOO extension tube (in place of the Viso) & a Telyt on any M body?

 

Can only guess at focus then. Or just focus at infinity. I considered this, but better just use an extension tube, cheaper

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a picture a photographer send me by email. He was watching me doing the birdshots...:D .

 

[

regards,

Jan

 

Dear Jan

 

Without the shoulder (gun) mount? I am actually afraid use in US. Can get shot! esp if aim at a plane near airport.

 

But looks like you just hold naturally (loosely speaking, of course :-)

 

Wonderful shot. Just received mine. will be testing on both M8 and DMR since I have both tubes in the set.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

jaap- do you still have it?

Jan- Fabulous shots! It really is a great handling lens, you show what it can really do. best....Peter

 

No; I have the Noflexar 400/5.6 on Pigriff C It is basically the same lens, but better corrected and faster, as it is a three-element achromat, as opposed to the Leitz 2-element. Built by Leica as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the 400/6.8 has significant curvature of field. I can certainly see that with shots taken with an R9 (same lens head as the M version). I was told Leica designed it this way to give an apparent increased depth of field as objects in the bottom of the field tend to be closer, I would take that with a marketing pinch of salt though. ;)

 

 

Bob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the 400/6.8 has significant curvature of field. I can certainly see that with shots taken with an R9 (same lens head as the M version). I was told Leica designed it this way to give an apparent increased depth of field as objects in the bottom of the field tend to be closer, I would take that with a marketing pinch of salt though. ;)

 

 

Bob.

It is just the excuse. The original two-element Leica 400/5.6 REALLY had curvature of field, so Leica went to 6.8 to get it within bounds. As it is it is fine for the application but don't start shooting newspapers or brick walls with it. The original 5.6 design was upgraded for Novoflex by adding a third kitted element, which was even more effective than the Leica edition, but made the lens heavier (not too much though) and a whole lot more expensive. Novoflex had their lens heads produced by Leica up to the mid-nineties, when production stopped, as popular perception made AF lenses preferable to the Novoflex squeeze-focus mount and the Leica slide-mount. There are Leica heads on Novoflex mounts around as well.It is still more exact than most AF systems though- and as quick. Both the Leica and the Novoflex lenses are still very good perfomers, especially with the edges cut off by the M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine it would be near impossible to focus without a Viso

the Viso is a bit of a Rube Goldberg solution and I am amazed at the images Peter and Jan got with theirs ...wonderful clarity

I am curious as to which adapter is needed for the 400 Telyt and also for the 200 Telyt

my local shop has a 200 Telyt in stock at a good price & I just got a Viso III with bellows & the 135 Tele Elmar

I am tempted to expand my Viso experience ...my results so far with macros have been very encouraging

Arthur,

 

You need and OUBIO or 16466M adapter to use the later Telyt 200 f4. I am not sure about the 400 on a Viso II or III.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am curious as to which adapter is needed for the 400 Telyt and also for the 200 Telyt

Arthur- No adapter needed for the 400/6.8 and I assume the other telyt telephotos. Just mount to that visoflex III and go have fun! best.....Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

QUOTE=gogopix]Dear Jan

 

Without the shoulder (gun) mount? I am actually afraid use in US. Can get shot! esp if aim at a plane near airport.

 

But looks like you just hold naturally (loosely speaking, of course :-)

 

Wonderful shot. Just received mine. will be testing on both M8 and DMR since I have both tubes in the set.

 

Regards

 

 

Hi Victor,

 

yes I only use the lens without all..It is very easy to hold and looks not so "dangerous"..

 

regards,

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arthur- No adapter needed for the 400/6.8 and I assume the other telyt telephotos. Just mount to that visoflex III and go have fun! best.....Peter

 

 

No! For the 200, 280 and earlier 400/5.0 you need the adapter OUBIO # 16466.

 

It is plentiful on the used market. Leicabeimeister has one and Cameraexpress has several, to my knowledge, but they are all over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...