Jump to content

Old lenses on the Monochrom. POST EXAMPLES HERE!

JeffoJeffo

By JeffoJeffo
in Leica M Monochrom

 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by jaapv,

How to upload images: Prepare the image as follows: 1.   The image should be sRGB and 8-bits 2.   Reduce the size to 2480 pixels on the longest side. (smaller sizes can be set, but are not recommended) 3.   Sharpen properly for screen. 4.   Save as JPG to your desktop, reducing JPG quality to produce 2000 kB (5000 kB for sponsoring members). 5.   In Lightroom these parameters should be set in the Export dialog. 6.   In the Forum posting or editing box, click “choose Files” and s
Recommended by jaapv

0 reactions

Go to this post
x
  • Replies 719
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

downstairs
downstairs

MM10

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

with ElmaritR 35. R lenses are clunky but give closer focus.   
colint544
colint544

A couple of M Monochrom shots, using my 1969 copy of the 90mm Tele-Elmarit "fat" version 1. Wide open at f2.8, incidentally.   You can clearly see the fabled "glow" on either side of the picture of

colint544
colint544

Couple of shots from Glasgow in the fog yesterday. M Monochrom mk1, 90mm Tele-Elmarit "fat" version 1

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Posted Images

JeffoJeffo

JeffoJeffo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

One more from this Hologon 15mm f8 on Monochrom~~~

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites
menos I M6

menos I M6

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The Hologon is the lens, that actually inspired me, to re-try all the wide angle lenses, I never used much and have at least one of them always with me - my current user is the Super Elmar:

 

21 ƒ3.4 Super Elmar:

8505851363_24a732b86b_c.jpg

street sweeper by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

 

8506960386_4f05a72ca2_c.jpg

street restaurant by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

 

8506960188_cfdc46cc9e_c.jpg

sweet potatos by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
JeffoJeffo

JeffoJeffo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hologon 15mm f8 + MM

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
sydkugelmass

sydkugelmass

Posted
Posted

"Deconstructing Isolation"

 

Noctilux 50mm/fr1 @f1. Monochrom, ISO 1600.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
manolo

manolo

Posted
Posted

Inspired by Jef & Dirk, here is the closest (m9 & hologon 16-f8)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites
manolo

manolo

Posted
Posted

Since it is almost a symmetrical design, It should be better than most.

 

It is very good, if you have enough light to have enough speed so that there is not movement blur.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
rickp13

rickp13

Posted
Posted

1982 75mm summilux

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
colint544

colint544

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Here's a shot from my M Monochrom, and a 1966-vintage 90mm Tele-Elmarit version 1 'fat' lens. Time and again, I read that this lens is not worth bothering with, because it has to be stopped down if you want sharp images. I just don't find that to be the case. This was shot with the lens wide open, in harsh light.

 

The Tele-Elmarit 90mm version 1 'fat' lens is tiny - even smaller than the 50mm Summilux ASPH, beautifully engineered, and can be purchased for buttons (in Leica terms). It's a veritable bargain.

 

Best wishes all,

 

Colin

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 22
Link to post
Share on other sites
JeffoJeffo

JeffoJeffo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Here's a shot from my M Monochrom, and a 1966-vintage 90mm Tele-Elmarit version 1 'fat' lens. Time and again, I read that this lens is not worth bothering with, because it has to be stopped down if you want sharp images. I just don't find that to be the case. This was shot with the lens wide open, in harsh light.

 

The Tele-Elmarit 90mm version 1 'fat' lens is tiny - even smaller than the 50mm Summilux ASPH, beautifully engineered, and can be purchased for buttons (in Leica terms). It's a veritable bargain.

 

Best wishes all,

 

Colin

 

 

What a wonderful shot! :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
Since it is almost a symmetrical design, It should be better than most.

 

It is very good, if you have enough light to have enough speed so that there is not movement blur.

 

Are there any pictures Hologon vs. Wate at 16mm?

Link to post
Share on other sites
manolo

manolo

Posted
Posted (edited)
Are there any pictures Hologon vs. Wate at 16mm?

 

I have the cv12 and the 18 super elmar. I use the hologon without the filter and so, it vignettes a lot more. It is also very slow (f8), the 18se is really good and best for color, the 12cv has to be used more carefully because it is more extreme (the hologon is not so much since the borders are generally darker and count less).

 

I guess the wate will be better for color (at least with a digital sensor) with less vignetting and faster. The hologon has less distortion. I would think that the corners are less problematic with the hologon since they count less.

 

I hope this helps a bit.

Edited by manolo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...