Jump to content

m lenses endurance


stump4545

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

are m lenses fragile at all?

 

my m lenses just came back from service for a check up and some that i do not use often and i thought worked perfect, but i had to change the focus mount on (2) of them.

 

( what is the focus mount anyway?)

 

are m lenses built like tanks or does one still have to be very careful when changing lenses?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

are m lenses fragile at all?

Awhile back, a friend picked up my camera bag that had not been properly buttoned up. Somehow the strap became tangled and the bag ended up horizontal in midair, top open. Out hopped my 50 Summilux, which fell about 3-3.5 feet, smacking on a tile hard tile floor that was laid over concrete slab. :eek:

 

The 'lux looked okay and seemed to function properly. It was still under warranty so I sent it to LEICA NJ to be checked. There was no damage. Either I was very lucky or Leica lenses are as tough as nails, or maybe a bit of both is the case.

 

Rangefinder mechanisms are vulnerable to impact, though. My M4-P was in a camera bag which was dropped about two feet. I had to send it off to have the rangefinder mechanism recalibrated - the impact had knocked it out of alignment (when focused at infinity distant objects appeared as a slight double image rather than as a single sharp image as they should have) .

 

Maybe the outcome of such mishaps is all in how a dropped camera or lens happens to land.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dropped a 50mm non-asph lens about 3 feet to a wooden floor some time ago, with no damage. It landed on it's side and that probably prevented dinging the front.

 

I also have a 50mm cron DR that was recently CLA'd, It's from 1968 and is not only a very special lens, but is working perfectly.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are built to last. But I won't suggest treating them rough, dropping them on hard floors (accidentally of course) or exposing them to rain, putting them under the sun, etc, are best, best avoided. At the same time, they are meant to be used and using them actually protects them, the lubrication will be distributed evenly (somewhat), no fungi or funny things growing on the lens and best of all, you get good value (use) from the heavy cash outlay for the ownership of each lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have a few lenses. I had a very weird issue, and mind you I am kind to my kit. I gently put my camera (mounted with a 2 month old 35luxfle) down on the table after taking a shot, then picked it back up to quickly take another and the focus ring was loose--considerably. I was so confused. Well, Leica NJ was AWESOME and I feel this might be a better testimony to Leica. The lenses are repairable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send used lenses to Leica, they often find some play in the focus mount, a.k.a. the helicoil. Their aim is to bring the lens back to factory spec, and that may mean a new focus mount or at least some repair work. However, as a normal user you will often not notice the play they are able to measure, so I don't have a problem with play as long as I am not able to detect it.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

One lens which is extremely fragile is the 28-35-50 Tri-Elmar, also called the MATE. It has the most complex focussing mount of any M lens. I dropped mine 18 inches onto ground, well protected in my camera bag and the three rings - aperture, focal length, focussing - locked up solid. There was no cosmetic damage at all and it cost something like £350 for Leica to rebuild the mount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One lens which is extremely fragile is the 28-35-50 Tri-Elmar, also called the MATE. It has the most complex focussing mount of any M lens. I dropped mine 18 inches onto ground, well protected in my camera bag and the three rings - aperture, focal length, focussing - locked up solid. There was no cosmetic damage at all and it cost something like £350 for Leica to rebuild the mount.

 

 

Thx for this, Mark,

 

from, now on I will look after the thing with even more special care. I had sent it in for coding a

while ago and they had to charge a bit more than a bit on top to rectify it. Worked great afterwards

and I´am VERY pleased with the technical quality of the photographs and with the lens.

 

So far it´s working fine, it never fell.

 

Best

GEORG

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are mostly superbly built with the ultimate (But not lightest) materials and all can be repaired and replaced.

 

A good clean, regrease and check can be well worth it. My 50 Elmar-M that is over 10 years old went away without a 6bit code and a little play (Bur worked perfectly) and now talks to my camera and is perfectly smooth, clean and the play has gone.

 

The concept of servicing for items that last 50+ years is fine by me. My 1968 Summaron is on the fron of my M9-P as I type :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...