pascal_meheut Posted March 12, 2007 Share #1  Posted March 12, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) C1 default profile works fine with 1.092 but I find it slightly greenish. And Edmund's profile is too contrasty for me: I wanted something close to the M8 default as well as the DMR one to mix images from both cameras.  Anyway, if someone wants to try it, here it is, slightly warm for skin tones:  http://pmeheut.free.fr/Leica%20M8%201_92%20default%20warm.icc  A "normal" version is also available:  http://pmeheut.free.fr/Leica%20M8%201_92%20default.icc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Hi pascal_meheut, Take a look here Another C1/IR filters profile for firmware 1.092. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
cbretteville Posted March 12, 2007 Share #2 Â Posted March 12, 2007 Thanks Pascal. I'll give them a try. - Carl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterv Posted March 12, 2007 Share #3 Â Posted March 12, 2007 Thanks Pascal. Â I agree on the 'green' part, and I'll give the profiles a try tomorrow. Â Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP3 Posted March 12, 2007 Share #4  Posted March 12, 2007 Pascal  Thanks for your profile. I'll give it a try.  Cheers Matthew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidigital Posted March 13, 2007 Share #5 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Pascal, I like them very much. I feel that Edmund's profiles can be a bit too contrasty at times ... leading to blown highlights. Your contrast is more controlled and the colors are very good also. Â Kurt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sps Posted March 13, 2007 Share #6 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Maybe I'm just easy to please.... Â I think the colors are incredibly natural. I was using one of Edmunds linear profiles, and find more detail in the highlights with yours. Â Thanks for the generous use of your spare time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #7 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) All I am getting is numbers on a web page wit this link on Safari Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #8 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Got it using Firefox Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #9 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Pacal these look very good. it does have a lot of contrast to start so i did have to lower it quite a bit . Thisis hot sun stuff with a lot of contrast to begin with but the colors look very good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #10 Â Posted March 13, 2007 One more with a little fill flash. All shot with the 75 lux Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #11  Posted March 13, 2007 This is nailed to the wall. perfect  BTW this is your normal version Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal_meheut Posted March 13, 2007 Author Share #12 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Thanks guys. I think that skin tones could still be better but I'm having a hard time optimizing them. If I can make something better, I'll let you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 13, 2007 Share #13 Â Posted March 13, 2007 It would not be to much, your very close. maybe a touch warm if anything. Now the portrait i did not have to touch the contrast and you really should go by that since it is very controlled lighting, although i did try the extra shadow detail and looked maybe a little better. Some clues for you, let me know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal_meheut Posted March 13, 2007 Author Share #14 Â Posted March 13, 2007 The "warm" profile has a little bit extra yellow in the reds because I found the skin tones too cold in the "normal" one but I'm not so sure now. Aniway, it is easy now to generate other profiles by changing contrast, saturation, hue and so on... Â Let me know exactly what you would like and I build them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_h Posted March 13, 2007 Share #15 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Thankyou Pascal, Â I'm going to try those out later. Â ---------- Guy, Â Easy to see why you shot that golf day after only 3 hours sleep.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted March 13, 2007 Share #16 Â Posted March 13, 2007 Thanks, Pascal. I also like the 1.092_default best. The following are shot with a B&W 486 filter. First the C1 3.7.6 default profile and then with your "default" profile: and here's another in the same living room light, but shot with a CV50/1.5 and 486 filter, using your default profile: Â scott Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal_meheut Posted March 14, 2007 Author Share #17  Posted March 14, 2007 Here is the new version with more details in the shadows and less saturation:  http://pmeheut.free.fr/Leica%20M8%20default%20v2.icc  And the same but with more saturation:  http://pmeheut.free.fr/Leica%20M8%20default%20sat_plus%20v2.icc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted March 14, 2007 Share #18 Â Posted March 14, 2007 It did open it up in the shadows Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.