Jump to content

An APO-Summicron-ASPH line of lenses?


atournas

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Puts says the the Marco Elmar 90 is as close to APO Leica gets without actually confirming it (writing the letters "APO" on the box) as such. I'm sure the new summicron meets the Leica standard as APO (a standard Puts says is quite high), but that doesn't mean the APO designation necessarily changes anything except the price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find myself agreeing with both Lars and 01af. Primarily because there are at least two kinds of CA.

 

Longitudinal CA - colored light focusing at different points - is the primary target of APO correction. And is more obvious and more urgently in need of correction with longer focal lengths, since it scales with image size.

 

Wide-angles tend to be plagued more with lateral CA - those purple/green or yellow/blue fringes in twigs and such in the corners of WA pictures. Whereas the longitudinal CA scales down with the wider field of view and is most pictures made with a 35 or wider is invisible.

 

So CA is a problem for all lenses (01af) - but APO correction is primarily usefully applied more to long lenses (Lars).

 

One need only look at the order in which Leica has introduced "APO" corrections to lenses. They didn't start with a 21mm lens and work up. They began with the 180mm APO-Telyt-R. Then the 400 f/2.8. In the M system, Leica also started applying APO corrections where they were most needed, at the long end, and worked their way down. 135>90>75>50

Link to post
Share on other sites

However what really looks funny is the flipping inscription on the new Apo-Summicron-M 50 mm Asph's front ring. I thought we left behind this ugly nonsense decades ago. Yuck! :eek:

I agree. It is extremely impractical that we have to use the camera upside down to get the best image quality with this lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. It is extremely impractical that we have to use the camera upside down to get the best image quality with this lens.

 

When the picture looks upside down, I stand on my head.

It requires excellent balance to the focus and shoot.

 

Gravity does get confusing.

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thorsten Overgaard has made some interesting remarks on his "what if" page regarding possible new lenses (written prior to the May 10 announcements). You can read them just under his very fine portrait of Peter Karbe ;)

 

http://overgaard.dk/leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-Leica-M10-Monochrome-Digital-Rangefinder.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems APO will be the new ASPH. It's one abberation that's been proactively corrected. I'll dust off an Erwin manual and see what else we might add to lens acronyms in the future ;)

 

It will only be 50mm + very fast glass as room for lettering could be a problem....

 

Reminds me of the 80's HiFi market, they were incredible at offering somethng you didn't know you needed and making it a must have

 

Still interested in what the images will look like, if and when the 35 comes out I wonder how close the pricing will be to the Nocti..... F2 is not really fast enough for shooting people indoors at night with the 9 IMO. I wonder if the M10 will add 1-2 stops in ISO performance making the need for luxes and the Nocti depth of field only ?

 

Sorry to ramble it must be the excitement :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

90/2.0 ASPH APO has been out since 1998... one of the first to receive the 'APO' designation..

 

THE FIRST LENS to get the APO designation from Leica is the APO-Telyt-R 180mm f3.4.

 

(unfortunately, the R line is now a dead end)

 

Guy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...