Jump to content

best portrait lens for M9 Suggestions


vinster

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've decided the 50 Summilux ASPH is my favorite portrait lens, although the 90/2.8 Elmarit-M is very close. In the end I like working a little closer with the subject, and, well, there's magic in the 50 Summilux ASPH. Just no other way to describe it.

 

Stephen

 

Here's one from my "Tattoo Guys" series from the Leica Akademie workshop at Venice Beach last month. M9 + 50 Summilux ASPH wide open...

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here's mine. My wife. on our wedding day. :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll second the Summilux 50mm, it also works great in low light.

 

Distance wise it will bring you closer to your subject, so if you're not that close with the person you shoot 90mm might be a better choice to start with.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found I have grown to love my tele-elmarit 90mm 2.8 for portraits (very late edition made in germany)

It is so compact compared to other 90mm's that I can always have it with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...even 16mm

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course I'm not suggesting these are traditional portraits but just showing you don't need to be welded to the idea of 75 or 90

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the B&W Ak©ada(e)mie(y) in Salt Lake City, Utard, Linda Leica slapped a 24 Summilux on my M9 and we went out to document Occupy Pioneer Square. I told the class the 24 was not really a portrait lens, to which guest instructor Roger Tuttle said "except for photojournalism."

I was able to stand a comfortable talking distance from the drummer boy and Isis Rose for these two environmental portraits. Neither was shot wide open - both about 2.4, so I left some bokeh on the table, but did get them in focus.

In the case of the extroverted Isis, when she insisted on showing off her tattoo there was a bit of a scrum among classmates and news photographers and the 24 put me in the front of the pack.

Drummer Boy was a hail Mary.

These might amplify some of the comments previously posted regarding distance from subject, etc.

Beware the Ak©ada(e)mie(y). It will make you want to buy a $7,000 lens, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

...

I don't know if the picture below is a portrait in the proper sense – I do not know the subject, he just couldn't get away! – but it was done with the Apo-Telyt.

 

The old man from the Age of the 9cm Elmar

 

Well apart from the unfortunate conflict between bayonet blade and face, I would regard this as a portrait and a good portrait too.

 

While many think of a portrait only in terms of showing some aspect of the human head, I believe many successful portraits include some environmental clues which add great value to a picture. Lars' picture lies in this genre. If one accepts the wider definition of a portrait, then almost any Leica lens could be used. It is a personal choice and the OP will have his own favourite.

 

As he already has just a 35mm lens, I would strongly suggest he considers adding a 75mm lens which works exceptionally well with a 35mm. If he favours 'bigger' heads in frame, choose a 90mm lens instead. Either of those two short/medium lenses is very versatile, both for portraits and other detailed subjects.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've decided the 50 Summilux ASPH is my favorite portrait lens, although the 90/2.8 Elmarit-M is very close. In the end I like working a little closer with the subject, and, well, there's magic in the 50 Summilux ASPH. Just no other way to describe it.

 

Stephen

 

Here's one from my "Tattoo Guys" series from the Leica Akademie workshop at Venice Beach last month. M9 + 50 Summilux ASPH wide open...

 

[ATTACH]287941[/ATTACH]

 

I like that one. So I can get a feel of the scene, about how far away were you? Did you try one with the ratio in focus and not the face?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A fantastic B&W portrait of the young boy at 16mm JonK

 

Thank you! I took the shot below first, but the clattering of the M9 made him turn to look at me.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why I can't host images from my Tumblr - but I promise you these are worth checking out - if somebody wants to rehost them they're even worth that time;) Not that I'm biased or anything;) I haven't posted images up on here in quite some time, I think you guys will enjoy. After all who doesn't like photos of models from fashion week shot with Noctilux's on M9's & M7's?

sometimes I like the 35...

35 'lux ASPH (George Lewis Jr. of Twin Shadow)

 

tumblr_luqvmdoG1h1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321592995&Signature=zbUq1kibys%2BZUOI3wp7iymrjO1c%3D

 

35,1.2 CV (Alan Palomo of Neon Indian)

 

tumblr_lssrakTBtM1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593021&Signature=OsnSJA%2B0RTXACiwMgCIX3TKvrLs%3D

 

Most of the time I like the Noctilux :

 

Fashion Week NYC

 

tumblr_lssns0SHpH1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593057&Signature=loosLqIBjVINwEXqHQrazxRCBUc%3D

 

tumblr_lssnszEy101qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593059&Signature=Wpx5Z2pDx6l%2BMvdtJLyspNU342M%3D

 

tumblr_lssnr5t57F1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593068&Signature=CTcKQX95KOcpdxNJrA0X0iCgd5w%3D

 

 

 

The Blonds show September 2011 NYC

 

tumblr_lssnszEy101qcgwhi

 

The Blonds show September 2011 NYC

 

tumblr_lssqmy1imc1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593029&Signature=5DW0vGQRJs9QgO8yXe57b3PQpPo%3D

 

Bam Margera @ The Blonds show:

 

tumblr_lssqmtrkgg1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593036&Signature=JR7HcVDeWGzIuh3yhTXz5heuBmw%3D

Sometimes I like the 90 Pre-ASPH

 

The Blonds - NYC (it was a colaboration with playboy this year)

tumblr_lssqlpWTjA1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593041&Signature=8shGWoihCNQwFqsHV0BVum444dE%3D

 

A beautiful Photographer on the street after a show in NYC :

 

tumblr_lssntajoDD1qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593051&Signature=2oTN%2BP42MxVPrOjx2R8f0fbfX%2FQ%3D

 

Sometimes I like the 90 Pre-ASPH

Hayden Panittiere @ Lollapalooza 2010

 

tumblr_ludd03H8f61qcgwhio1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ6IHWSU3BX3X7X3Q&Expires=1321593005&Signature=MoQkrebNhv0JbU7AJBtgeqkIlfw%3D

 

& sometimes I use my Leica Summicron-R APO on my D3:

Nigumi of Little Dragon:

 

tumblr_lr1m1fhAoh1qcgwhio1_400.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonK-

 

I think I like that one better than the other you showed. I assume 16mm is a WATE? Did you use the WATE finder? To me it has a very nice rendering.

 

I prefer it too. If only the M9 was as quiet as my M3 I could have got another frame or two.

Yes I used the WATE with finder; I'm nowhere near comfortable with it yet but it's early days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of "portrait" in the traditional sense (trivially said : "a face and little or no more"), my idea is that 75 and over are anyway the focals to consider : personally, I like a lot some of the "old" Leitz 90mm wxpecially when think of making a BW print : hereunder an example taken with an Elmar 90mm f4... one of the cheapest Leitz lenses one can find :

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Summarit 75 is imho also a great performer :

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like that one. So I can get a feel of the scene, about how far away were you? Did you try one with the ratio in focus and not the face?

 

I don't remember exactly how far I was, but it was a small tattoo shop, and the guys were busy so I had to hurry. I believe I was about 4ft. away from the subject. I cropped a little (less than 10%) to remove some distracting background elements.

 

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! I took the shot below first, but the clattering of the M9 made him turn to look at me.

 

I also like this second shot much more than the first. The geometry here is fantastic. The triangle roof in the background, the triangle formed by the little boy's chin and neck, another triangle formed by his arm. Even the distorted perspective of his foot ads to the composition. A wonderful shot.

 

As for the noise of the M9, well yes it's louder than an MP or any film Leica, which is why I shoot in continuous so I can capture several images when the proper moment unfolds.

 

Great job!!!

 

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...