Jump to content

choose only three lens`


smdavey

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

so question is..

 

leica M3

 

i have a 50mm

also 40mm.

 

but i think better to sell the 40mm.

 

so if you can only have 3 lens`

 

which ones would you choose.

 

 

 

also.

 

 

when being developed i have a choice of tiff or jpeg , should i choose tiff as an un compressed jpeg. or does it not matter?

 

 

over to you............

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd say it depends on what and where you'd like to take photos. I'm myself thinking of three lenses right now for my purpose (I only have the Elmarit 28 at the moment).

 

Elmarit 28 - General purpose use.

 

Summilux 21 - Available light interior documentation.

 

Elmar 24 - For highly detailed B&W shots of old buildings/environments.

 

--

 

For the file type I'd say uncompressed jpeg seems to be more universal, at least when asking the local printing services here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Using an external finder is no hassle at all. 24, 35, 50. But 90 can also come in very handy for portraits and details. And the 135 is a beautiful lens but more special purpose. It all depends what you're shooting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've currently got quite a range which I am thinking of downsizing because it doesn't get used up. In particular I have a CV 35 1.2, 40 C Summicron, 75 Summicron, 75 Summilux and 90 Elmarit.

 

The 90 doesn't get used at all by me so that one will go, the CV is a great lens but not very compact (a 35 Leica Summilux is much better in this respect). The 40 C is a fantastic lens which especially on my spare M8 makes for a great lens because it is close to the standard 50 mm. The 75s are a bit redundant and I don't know what to do with those yet in terms of keeping one (and which one) or keeping both (hard to justify the expense really).

 

I have found that just two lenses would suffice my needs absolutely - I recently shot a wedding in Miami with the 75 Summilux and the 35 CV - one married to my M8 and the other to my M9 (I changed the lenses between the cameras on a couple of occasions) and that worked like a charm. Wide Angle? wouldn't really use it often personally. 90 mm lenses? too bulky (especially when shooting a 13-hour wedding). And the size is also one of the shortcomings of the 75 Summilux to my mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow...

thanks for the replies))

 

i got rid of my 90 elmar because it just felt wrong on the M3 and i never used it.

 

i was thinking i would like a really wide angle lens.

seems people love or dislike them shall we say.

 

but. like i said. i have the 40 and the 50 now. so was thinking would be better to get rid of the 40 to get wide angle(15-21 something around there). then later on get a 75......

 

ok, and at process, i should get uncompressed jpegs? which i can use in lightroom.

 

many thanks all

steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

35mm Summaron 2.8

50mm DR Summicron

90mm Collapsible Elmar

 

All "match" the body and the first two share an IROOA ;)

 

Learn to use the 90, not to pull things closer but to isolate the subject. It will reward you.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...