Reloading 2.0 Firmware

[symmetron]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I was talking with Leica Service a few weeks ago regarding my X1 which although having uploaded and installed the 2.0 firmware (camera shows 2.0 installed), it still seems to have some inconsistency in acquiring focus. I never really used the camera with 1.0 firmware as I uploaded 2.0 as soon as I bought it. So, I have no basis of comparison on the improvement in 2.0 over 1.0.

 

Anyway, the guy from Leica service recommended reloading 2.0 firmware. That seems very odd. Has anyone reloaded 2.0 after already installing it and , if so, was any difference noted after reloading?

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[ECliffordSmith]

Hi Vettran,

 

I have not reloaded the firmware but I suppose it is a little like asking for a reboot of a PC to reflect software changes. It cannot do any harm and in case something went wrong in the previous load it could fix your issue.

 

I would suggest loading the firmware again as this is what Leica state you should do.

 

I hope it does solve your problem!

[symmetron]

Thanks for your recommendation.

 

I already reloaded it without any issues. Unfortunately, there were no noticeable changes or improvements.

 

BTW, it's interesting that after 216 "viewings" of this thread, somebody (yourself), actually commented.

 

Thanks again.

[prk60091]

Thanks for your recommendation.

 

I already reloaded it without any issues. Unfortunately, there were no noticeable changes or improvements.

 

BTW, it's interesting that after 216 "viewings" of this thread, somebody (yourself), actually commented.

 

Thanks again.

-

 

your post asked for specific information and obviously no one had the exact answer you requested.

[tnturnerx1]

Sorry I'm so late responding. Maybe too late to help you, but maybe help someone else. I had the same question with a twist. I, too, immediately updated the firmware 2.0 before taking any shots. I have only had my X1 for less than 2 weeks and have been taking many pics to test it out. I am so disappointed with the image quality, that I'm seriously considering returning it. Also, the firmware update was so fast, I even doubted it worked. The menu displayed "firmware version 2.0" but I didn't know if it was truly updated, so I updated it again. No difference. I have since discovered a few things. There are many posts about the X1 regarding slow focus. I think what those people should say is "bad focus at slow shutter speed". Your hand simply cannot hold the camera still during the time it takes for the X1 to focus. I tested X1 under different light conditions, and with fully auto operation, this camera just won't work for dim light situations and slower shutter speeds. The image stability cannot correct bad focus. Outside, with lower ISO, and auto shutter speed from 1/40-1/80, I get good shots. Any slower shutter speeds result in unfocused images. This camera, with a hot-shoe flash, may be suitable for indoor shots, but I don't know. I'm just amazed at the poor quality images in these situations and never have had a camera behave like this.

[jaapv]

Are you expecting AF to change focus during a long exposure?. On all cameras in the world that is not the case, it would make for some funny images. If you are unable to keep a camera pointed at your subject for half a second, may I suggest the use of a tripod - not for camera stability, but for framing...

I am no fan of arm's-length composing on an LCD, nor of other point-and shoot features, reason I will not buy an X1 or similar, but if you are unable to get excellent low light results with the X1 there can be but one conclusion - pilot error.