Jump to content

28mm 2.8 asph?


virgilstarkwell

Recommended Posts

The asph version is contrastier with less fall-off in the corners than the pre-asph and - some say - sharper (I don't wish to be drawn into the endless sharpness/acutance/resolution etc debate;)).

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The asph version is contrastier with less fall-off in the corners than the pre-asph and - some say - sharper (I don't wish to be drawn into the endless sharpness/acutance/resolution etc debate;)).

 

Pete.

 

Are we talking dramatic or pedantic differences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Are we talking dramatic or pedantic differences?

 

It may be higher contrast - I don't own the earlier lens, so I've never compared the two - but I've never had a problem with high contrast in practice.

 

Not sure what Noel is saying about it being difficult to mount, I've owned the lens for 4 years or so and never had a problem. It's about the same size as a 35mm Summicron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking about getting this lens. Why do I need asph? What will I miss if I opt to save the $ and get the pre-asph version? Thanks.

If you are not very critical, you may not be able to tell the difference at normal working apertures.

 

I do not find it too small or difficult to mount on an M-body.

 

The results are superb. You can always soften your image in post-processing; it is impossible to restore the missing excellence with an older lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking about getting this lens. Why do I need asph? What will I miss if I opt to save the $ and get the pre-asph version? Thanks.

 

I have owned the version IV in the past but now have the asph version. It is a much improved lens, significantly smaller which imo makes a huge difference. You won't regret it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get any lens and test, but the Elmarit 28mm ASPH it's superb! It's my favourite lens for all purposes in the M8, and the results are great.

 

It's compact, light and 39 mm filters, standard for Leica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have owned the version IV in the past but now have the asph version. It is a much improved lens, significantly smaller which imo makes a huge difference. You won't regret it!

 

Same here. I also prefer the ASPH over the IV version, which I sold to fund my current lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 for the ASPH. Bitingly sharp and high contrast.

One of my favourites on the M8. Less so on the M9. I have a hard time adjusting to the 28mm FOV.

Worth considering if you have an M8 and plan to move to full frame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what Noel is saying about it being difficult to mount, I've owned the lens for 4 years or so and never had a problem. It's about the same size as a 35mm Summicron.

Hi Steve

 

Mine is really tight on some bodies, and the mounting ring is so small, and you dare not use the infinity stop and focus ring.

 

I dont use it on some bodies, dealer offered to send it back for new mount ring.

 

It is easily mistaken for 35mm cron.

 

Noel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...