MarkP Posted June 21, 2011 Share #1  Posted June 21, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) MLC Centre: 230m. Located in central Sydney and designed by famous Australian architect Harry Seidler. Built in late 1970's. 230m tall  M9, 28/2.0 Summicron, 50/1.5 C Sonnar, 75/2.0 Summicron  [ATTACH]263815[/ATTACH]    [ATTACH]263819[/ATTACH]    [ATTACH]263825[/ATTACH]    [ATTACH]263817[/ATTACH]    [ATTACH]263816[/ATTACH]    [ATTACH]263820[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 21, 2011 Posted June 21, 2011 Hi MarkP, Take a look here MLC Centre, Sydney. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
businessasusual Posted June 21, 2011 Share #2 Â Posted June 21, 2011 Very Kewl, Mark :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oz_Hillbilly Posted June 21, 2011 Share #3  Posted June 21, 2011 Some great images here, Mark. I love the three stark tones in the first image. Interesting specular highlight or flare on the reflection in the bottom right corner? B/W is a good choice for these.  As a series, i'd edit some of the repetitive images and choose the best 3 or 4.  The plane adds some interest to the later image (and is a little earie as we approach 10 years from 9/11).  I used to work in this building many years ago on the 64th floor - very cool. I now work almost opposite across Martin Place.  Thanks for sharing  Oz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted June 21, 2011 Share #4 Â Posted June 21, 2011 Mark - Â Beautiful, dramatic, terrific subtle toning and fine tonal richness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pauledell Posted June 22, 2011 Share #5 Â Posted June 22, 2011 Mark, Â I agree with Oz about thinning out some of the repetition. I like the third with the airplane added to the picture and the fifth for its outstanding composition. A nice series. Â Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted June 22, 2011 Author Share #6 Â Posted June 22, 2011 Thanks for all of your comments. Â Paul, the aircraft flew overhead as I was composing the image... not placed there in PP. Â I also thought there were too many, my perference is to keep 1-3 (and then either 4 or 5 in descending order), but I'm really interested in which ones you all think I should keep. Â Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pauledell Posted June 22, 2011 Share #7  Posted June 22, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thanks for all of your comments. Paul, the aircraft flew overhead as I was composing the image... not placed there in PP.  I also thought there were too many, my preference is to keep 1-3 (and then either 4 or 5 in descending order), but I'm really interested in which ones you all think I should keep.  Mark Mark,  I didn't mean to infer that you added it by PP. I'm sure that it flew over as you composed it. At any rate, I think it adds a lot to the picture. I would also add the second shot also for its fine pespective and composition.  Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted June 22, 2011 Author Share #8 Â Posted June 22, 2011 Hi Paul, we're really having communicartion problems today:rolleyes: Â 1-3 meant 1,2, and 3 - -not 1 and 3. You haven't suggest which ones I should dump. Â Regards, Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pauledell Posted June 22, 2011 Share #9 Â Posted June 22, 2011 Hi Paul,we're really having communicartion problems today:rolleyes: Â 1-3 meant 1,2, and 3 - -not 1 and 3. You haven't suggest which ones I should dump. Â Regards, Mark Sorry Mark, Â If it were up to me, I'd dump the No.1 and No.4. They are alright but the others are stronger without the added buildings. Â Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted June 23, 2011 Author Share #10  Posted June 23, 2011 Sorry Mark, If it were up to me, I'd dump the No.1 and No.4. They are alright but the others are stronger without the added buildings.  Paul  Oh, I really like #1:(, but I agree about #4.  Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyril Jayant Posted July 18, 2011 Share #11 Â Posted July 18, 2011 Mark -Â Beautiful, dramatic, terrific subtle toning and fine tonal richness. +1 Terrific is not the word.. Fabulous...... Thanks for the link Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.