Jump to content

Leica M9-P ????


John.of.Gaunt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 501
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest raoul1
Hmm. Leaving aside any attempt at basic politeness, do I understand your point that you use the LCD to check your focus? Is that your point?

 

Over on another thread, you also said this about Thorsten Overgaard's M9 review:

 

 

I must confess, I find your points in various threads hard to pin down, apart from an apparent desire to be controversial, if not offensive.

 

There are many photographers on this forum who don't want live view, who don't chimp, and don't use the LCD for checking focus. I appreciate you're making your points "for the last time" - I only hope that it is.

 

Yes, Leica needs to be competitive, and you might be correct that higher ISO performance will make it more competitive. I agree that the M9 is not cast in stone. In fact, I would probably agree with a lot of what you post, if you went about it in a more agreeable way.

 

Cheers

John

 

About politeness:

I'm reading this forum for a couple of years now, and it took my attention that when someone begins to write about the shortcomings of the M a lot of reactions are very annoying. Even when the writer is a professional who works also with Leica, he is treated as if he is a beginner, or his arguments are misunderstood on purpose, or just ignored. What do you think? Every day we have to make several items, in different light conditions. Year after year. We read a lot of books on photography, took courses, and above all got a lot of experience, testing cameras, comparing them to others, and so on and on. It is our profession. What are the answers a lot of the time?: you should expose better, you should learn something on postprocessing, I do not need high ISO, I do not need a better LCD screen, or a faster buffer. There are famous photo's made with Leica's.

We just have to judge its capacities, and compare them too cameras of other trade marks, keeping in mind that a lot of people in these days do need things as written above, and most certainly a lot of professionals.( What is possible will be asked.) For a firm it is better if it has critical users than people who justify almost everything because they have a camera of a famous trade mark. Well, it's just a tool.

I'm sorry if I wrote a little too offensive in earlier comments, but from time to time I get tired of what I explained in my first sentences here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, what pisses many people off - me included - is the tendency of some people to write as if they represent everyone. "We need live-view" is not the same as "I want live view". People feel disenfranchised and disconnected by such sweeping generalisations and often react negatively as a result.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel that a number of threads are derailed as individuals respond to the way others write rather than to the content. Or, alternatively, frequently individuals pose opinions as facts. And then, some individuals get off once a shortcoming/improvement is suggested to anything Leica.

 

At the same time, I also benefit from the vast knowledge and experience incorporated in the participants of the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As soon as an AF Leica comes out, you'll all pay any price for one.

 

Isn't that the S2?

 

I'm sorry if I wrote a little too offensive in earlier comments, but from time to time I get tired of what I explained in my first sentences here.

 

I understand. Any written exchange, especially on the internet, has the problem of seeing only what is written and then often out of context. You may feel strongly about better high ISO, better LCD and buffering, and you may well be right - they may be addressed. But for me, they are less important than composition, framing, exposure and bringing out the strengths of my camera and my lenses.

 

The issue for me is that you make assumptions my skill levels, my experience, and how I use my equipment.

 

Cheers

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not fallacious reasoning when you believe that anything is possible. In any case, I don't believe that any camera designers or engineers have told me that the idea is impossible.

 

The only people who have said that are a bunch of self professed "experts" on a forum.

 

There has been opposition to every innovation in the history of man, with the

possible exception of the sword.

-- Benjamin Dana

 

 

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible,

he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he

is very probably wrong.

-- Arthur C. Clarke

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Alice laughed: "There's no use trying," she said; "one can't believe impossible things."

 

"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

 

- Alice in Wonderland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having now read about 100 messages arguing over whether it is possible, or even desirable, to improve upon the M9's design, I'm reminded of the book "The Little Prince," which teaches that we grow to love the things we waste our time on. Before I bought my M9, and had talked myself into such an expensive purchase, all I could see were the limitations of the camera in comparison to the features of cheaper DSLRs. Then I bought it, and proceeded to lavish it with several hundred hours of my time to learn how to focus, how to choose the right exposure, how to benefit from Lightroom, and on and on. I'm truly delighted by the images that have resulted from all of this effort. But the point is that while I was investing so many hours of my time, I grew to love the M9. And no one likes to hear criticism of their loved ones. It's a bit irrational, but there you have it. I wonder if others feel the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having now read about 100 messages arguing over whether it is possible, or even desirable, to improve upon the M9's design, I'm reminded of the book "The Little Prince," which teaches that we grow to love the things we waste our time on. Before I bought my M9, and had talked myself into such an expensive purchase, all I could see were the limitations of the camera in comparison to the features of cheaper DSLRs. Then I bought it, and proceeded to lavish it with several hundred hours of my time to learn how to focus, how to choose the right exposure, how to benefit from Lightroom, and on and on. I'm truly delighted by the images that have resulted from all of this effort. But the point is that while I was investing so many hours of my time, I grew to love the M9. And no one likes to hear criticism of their loved ones. It's a bit irrational, but there you have it. I wonder if others feel the same.

 

 

I feel the same and i'm in love with my M9.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It is ok for you M9 owners, I'll be in a street market on Saturday and a heavy hand will land on my shoulder, noo Ive annoyed some one taking their photo, and they are going to hit me...

 

No it will be another M9 user who wants to read the top plate script on my M2...

 

The M9 users dont try the rangefnder or the wind lever they are perverts who just read the top plate script like it was 'Lady Chatterlys lover'

 

Noel

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ok for you M9 owners, I'll be in a street market on Saturday and a heavy hand will land on my shoulder, noo Ive annoyed some one taking their photo, and they are going to hit me...

 

No it will be another M9 user who wants to read the top plate script on my M2.

 

The beauties of silver chrome and Leitz/Leica engraving are best savoured in the calm of your study, surrounded by books of Leica lore, and with a glass of fine brandy in your hand. My experience of compulsive top-plate readers has been that these are Leicabores. They are not really interested in your M2. What they really want to do is to boast to you about their latest ASPH purchase(s).

 

The best countermeasure is to switch lenses as they approach, so that they suddenly realise that your camera is fitted with a lens of which they have no experience. A 73mm f1.9 Hektor or an 85mm f1.5 Summarex are ideal candidates, but I have enjoyed some success with the 5cm f1.4 Nikkor, a wartime 5cm f2 Sonnar, or even the mysterious ‘no-name’ 58mm f1.5 Leica Sonnar.

 

At this point, the Leicabore will lose all interest in your engraved top plate and will insist on being allowed to try out this strange lens. Wait until he has filled up the buffer of the M8 or M9 camera and is waiting impatiently for the first image to display. Neatly detach your lens from his camera, and beat a hasty retreat.

 

The demented creature will eventually rush off home for a few hours of blissful pixel peeping in the hopes of proving the utter superiority of modern lenses over whatever curious relic of the optical past you exposed him to.

 

Best regards,

 

Doug

Link to post
Share on other sites

The beauties of silver chrome and Leitz/Leica engraving are best savoured in the calm of your study, surrounded by books of Leica lore, and with a glass of fine brandy in your hand. My experience of compulsive top-plate readers has been that these are Leicabores. They are not really interested in your M2. What they really want to do is to boast to you about their latest ASPH purchase(s).

 

The best countermeasure is to switch lenses as they approach, so that they suddenly realise that your camera is fitted with a lens of which they have no experience. A 73mm f1.9 Hektor or an 85mm f1.5 Summarex are ideal candidates, but I have enjoyed some success with the 5cm f1.4 Nikkor, a wartime 5cm f2 Sonnar, or even the mysterious ‘no-name’ 58mm f1.5 Leica Sonnar.

 

At this point, the Leicabore will lose all interest in your engraved top plate and will insist on being allowed to try out this strange lens. Wait until he has filled up the buffer of the M8 or M9 camera and is waiting impatiently for the first image to display. Neatly detach your lens from his camera, and beat a hasty retreat.

 

The demented creature will eventually rush off home for a few hours of blissful pixel peeping in the hopes of proving the utter superiority of modern lenses over whatever curious relic of the optical past you exposed him to.

 

Best regards,

 

Doug

Hi Doug

 

They have not shown any interest on my Nikkor HC, or CV f/2.5 only the script, they do discuss the possible costs of an ALC M9 or replacement top plate,...

 

The Nikkor is a nice lens on the M9.

 

To be fair only been stopped three times so far. But given that M9 are not that high volume yet, the M9 people sheem to be shooters rather than hoarders.

 

Noel

Link to post
Share on other sites

The beauties of silver chrome and Leitz/Leica engraving are best savoured in the calm of your study, surrounded by books of Leica lore, and with a glass of fine brandy in your hand. My experience of compulsive top-plate readers has been that these are Leicabores. They are not really interested in your M2. What they really want to do is to boast to you about their latest ASPH purchase(s).

 

The best countermeasure is to switch lenses as they approach, so that they suddenly realise that your camera is fitted with a lens of which they have no experience. A 73mm f1.9 Hektor or an 85mm f1.5 Summarex are ideal candidates, but I have enjoyed some success with the 5cm f1.4 Nikkor, a wartime 5cm f2 Sonnar, or even the mysterious ‘no-name’ 58mm f1.5 Leica Sonnar.

 

At this point, the Leicabore will lose all interest in your engraved top plate and will insist on being allowed to try out this strange lens. Wait until he has filled up the buffer of the M8 or M9 camera and is waiting impatiently for the first image to display. Neatly detach your lens from his camera, and beat a hasty retreat.

 

The demented creature will eventually rush off home for a few hours of blissful pixel peeping in the hopes of proving the utter superiority of modern lenses over whatever curious relic of the optical past you exposed him to.

 

Best regards,

 

Doug

 

Do you open your boiled egg at the sharp or the blunt end?

Link to post
Share on other sites

{snipped}

 

The M9 users dont try the rangefnder or the wind lever they are perverts who just read the top plate script like it was 'Lady Chatterlys lover'

 

I know what you're saying, but I think you're confusing M9 users with Leica collectors :) I couldn't care less what's on top of the camera. And my M6 and M3 means I get to use the wind lever often, thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...