kokoshawnuff Posted January 7, 2012 Share #61 Posted January 7, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) I've been experimenting with the basics; Tri-X and D-76. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1:1 @ 400 at 22°c for 8:30 1:1 @ 320 at 20°c for 9:30 1:1 @ 800 at 24°c for 7:30 (all of the negs turned out muddy with bazaar grain) Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1:1 @ 400 at 22°c for 8:30 1:1 @ 320 at 20°c for 9:30 1:1 @ 800 at 24°c for 7:30 (all of the negs turned out muddy with bazaar grain) ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1890679'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 7, 2012 Posted January 7, 2012 Hi kokoshawnuff, Take a look here The Film Thread. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Stealth3kpl Posted January 7, 2012 Author Share #62 Posted January 7, 2012 Kodak Portra 160: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Fuji Pro 800Z: Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Fuji Pro 800Z: ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1891514'>More sharing options...
pico Posted January 8, 2012 Share #63 Posted January 8, 2012 If we judge the quality of photos shown in this media that were made with film compared to digital, I'm afraid we would find an awful lot of really crappy film images. Even the technically better films do not translate well through the migration necessary to put them here. It's downright embarrassing to compare film to digital here. Just making a film image has no virtue when put here: most suck from composition to decomposition to digital. . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted January 8, 2012 Author Share #64 Posted January 8, 2012 I still find I prefer that crappy look. Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jobin Posted January 8, 2012 Share #65 Posted January 8, 2012 . Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1892298'>More sharing options...
AbbeyFoto Posted January 9, 2012 Share #66 Posted January 9, 2012 Adox 20 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1893045'>More sharing options...
AbbeyFoto Posted January 9, 2012 Share #67 Posted January 9, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Adox 20 Crop at 50% Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1893046'>More sharing options...
epm Posted January 19, 2012 Share #68 Posted January 19, 2012 I am not sure if we were to "find" images or post our own? I will post my own, it is easier for me. Here goes: 1st is Tri-X 2nd is Efke 25 3rd is Kodak NC 400 4th is Ektar 100 Thanks great idea! Eric Eric Patrick McCormack Photography - Fine Art and Portrait Photography Flickr: E_Mack's Photostream Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1902027'>More sharing options...
alw Posted January 19, 2012 Share #69 Posted January 19, 2012 I find this thread most useful, but it would be even more useful if the processing chemicals (B/W) and the solution were mentioned alongside the film type used. I believe it makes a huge difference? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted January 19, 2012 Share #70 Posted January 19, 2012 The developer can make a huge difference to the putput from silver based black and white film, so is very relevant to the discussion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jobin Posted January 19, 2012 Share #71 Posted January 19, 2012 I agree, my shots appear different than other photos posted but with the same film. Although I am new to film, I still have not produced one image I find sharp and crisp, even when shooting with FP4. Are my photos over-developed or what? HP5 and Illfosol. I find this thread most useful, but it would be even more useful if the processing chemicals (B/W) and the solution were mentioned alongside the film type used. I believe it makes a huge difference? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1902623'>More sharing options...
andybarton Posted January 19, 2012 Share #72 Posted January 19, 2012 I tried Ilfosol years ago and didn't like it. I have settled on HC110 Dil-B now (for Tri-X), or Paterson FX-39 for Pan F+ and I am very happy with the results from both. As an aside, I hope that someone picks up HC110 when Kodak go t-u. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted January 19, 2012 Share #73 Posted January 19, 2012 I agree, my shots appear different than other photos posted but with the same film. Although I am new to film, I still have not produced one image I find sharp and crisp, even when shooting with FP4. Are my photos over-developed or what? HP5 and Illfosol. Are you scanning negatives or prints? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jobin Posted January 19, 2012 Share #74 Posted January 19, 2012 Im scanning them with a Plustek 7200 with silverfast. I dont hear many others using ilfolsol, it's just what I had in the darkroom at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alw Posted January 19, 2012 Share #75 Posted January 19, 2012 I tried Ilfosol years ago and didn't like it. I have settled on HC110 Dil-B now (for Tri-X), or Paterson FX-39 for Pan F+ and I am very happy with the results from both. As an aside, I hope that someone picks up HC110 when Kodak go t-u. I read somewhere that Ilfosol is practically the same as HC110. Anyway, I use HC110 (Dil-H) solely for all my films as I´m too timid to experiment. Andy: Do you recommend any special times for HC110/Tri-X combo? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_n Posted January 19, 2012 Share #76 Posted January 19, 2012 By the way, I read that APX 100 (in 35mm format, at least) is back from the dead. Were you aware of that?Well, supposed to be coming back. The chat is that ADOX Premium Pan 100 will be APX 100. These two are APX 100 developed in Xtol and scanned with a Konica Minolta DS IV using VueScan: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140571-the-film-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1902688'>More sharing options...
alw Posted January 19, 2012 Share #77 Posted January 19, 2012 That APX100 sure looks good! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
epm Posted January 19, 2012 Share #78 Posted January 19, 2012 Tri-X was processed in D76 1:1 9:50' development normal agitation 68 degrees. Efke was processed Rodinal 30:100 1 hour stand development agitation at 30 min. 68 degrees. I am not sure if we were to "find" images or post our own? I will post my own, it is easier for me. Here goes:1st is Tri-X 2nd is Efke 25 3rd is Kodak NC 400 4th is Ektar 100 Thanks great idea! Eric Eric Patrick McCormack Photography - Fine Art and Portrait Photography Flickr: E_Mack's Photostream Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbeyFoto Posted January 19, 2012 Share #79 Posted January 19, 2012 I find this thread most useful, but it would be even more useful if the processing chemicals (B/W) and the solution were mentioned alongside the film type used. I believe it makes a huge difference? Adox 20 requires a specialist brew Adotech. It is similar to the old Kodak Technical Pan but does not have the biased red sensitivity of Tech Pan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted January 19, 2012 Author Share #80 Posted January 19, 2012 I dont hear many others using ilfolsol. This is Legacy Pro 100 (Acros) with Ilfosol3. This was the first home developing I'd done for nearly 30 years and I was very pleased with it. I fancied something with a bit more grain and contrast so I've started using TriX and HP5+ in D76. This is Legacy Pro 100 (Acros) in Diafine: This is Legacy Pro 100 in D76: Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.