james.liam Posted October 23, 2010 Share #1 Posted October 23, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Experiences, opinions are invited especially if you have first-hand comparisons to other great SLR 28's (Nikkors, Zeiss especially)... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 23, 2010 Posted October 23, 2010 Hi james.liam, Take a look here Leica R 28 Elmarit v.2. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
james.liam Posted October 31, 2010 Author Share #2 Posted October 31, 2010 No takers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted October 31, 2010 Share #3 Posted October 31, 2010 Well, I'll bite. Although I have little personal experience with the 28 R v.2, I have used the Nikkor 28 f/2.8 AIS, Zeiss G Biogon, Zeiss Contax R, and Canon FD 28 f/2.8s, as well as all the flavors of Leica M 28 f/2.8s. I've never run across a really bad 28 f/2.8 (at least among those designed in the past 40 years) - presumably because the combination of moderate aperture and moderate-wide field of view make it a relatively easy lens to get right for either SLRs or RFs. Leica's first attempts at retrofocus 28s (M v.2, R v.1) stumbled ever so slightly with some corner fuzziness, but that was 40 years ago. Erwin Puts rates the v.2 R lens as "2 stops better" than the v.1 - and better than the contemporaneous 1992 M 28 f/2.8 v.4 by f/5.6 - which is saying a lot. Given that by 1994 Leica had such lenses as the 19 f/2.8 v.2 (a much wider and thus trickier lens to design) - I can't imagine them going ahead with a redesign of an "easy" 28 that was anything less than stellar. Especially since "stellar" seems to be a low bar for that focal length and aperture. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted October 31, 2010 Share #4 Posted October 31, 2010 There have been four models of Elmarit-R 28/2.8 AFAIK: 11204 (1970-1985), 11247 (1985-1994), 11259 (1994-1997) and 11333 (1997-2009). Yours is the 11259 or 11333 i guess. I've been using the 11204 and 11259 with film and a Canon 5D1, together with a Zuiko 28/2 recently. My favorite is the Zuiko for its speed, tiny size and lesser vignette but the 11259 is not far and i find its built-in hood quite handy. The 11204 is smaller, has the charm of its vintage but vignettes too much on the 5D1. The Nikkor 28/2.8 D is better than its reputation i feel but it lacks character compared to the others. None of those lenses can be compared favourably to both the Summicron-M 28/2 and Elmarit-M 28/2.8 asph as far as sharpness though IMHO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted October 31, 2010 Share #5 Posted October 31, 2010 I have used the latest version, with ROM and built-in hood for several years now, on film, DMR and now Nikon D700. I am extremely pleased with it. There are lots of examples on my website, and the Hadrian's Wall one via this link LANDSCAPE AND TRAVEL is currently hanging on my landing wall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.liam Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share #6 Posted November 1, 2010 Thank you for your inputs! As an aside, the Nikkor 28/2.8 mentioned is indeed a wonderful and tiny optic but it is optimized for near distances. Shooting landscapes and panoramas, it is just average, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.