Jump to content

V-lux1 + tele..


Dopaco

Recommended Posts

I'm not entirely sure what the question is but teleconverters of the type you mention, i.e. ones that fit on front of the existing lens, are generally of less than satisfactory quality. I guess it's better than nothing, if you must, but if it's for more than very occassional use then you need another camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like asking if a horse, or a banana are better than light-bulb.

Definitely the banana, Pete. If you've ever tried making a banana-split using a horse or a light-bulb, you'll know for sure. Not a pretty sight.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

V-lux1 + tele

 

Panasonic lumix fz50 teleconversor

 

What counsel give.

 

Digilux2

Digilux3

D-lux4

 

Are these better than v-lux1?..

 

Thanks

Dopaco,

 

Like James, I'm having difficulty understanding what you're asking us and what photographs you want to make.

 

So, a V-Lux 1 + tele-convertor will allow you to take photos of far away things but the quality of the photos will not be as good as photos from a Digilux 2, a Digilux 3, or a D-Lux 4.

 

If you're asking which is the best camera out of the 4 then I choose the Digilux 2.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...