Jump to content

A pointless comparison (5DII vs X1)


larbel

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As title said, a pointless comparion for the heck of it :D

 

Top: 5DII, 24-105L @35mm, f4, ISO400, 1/13 secs AWB

Bottom: X1 f4, ISO400, 1/15 secs AWB

 

Both images were shot in RAW and converted with Lightroom 2.6.1. The X1 WB was untouched while trying to match the 5DII's WB against it, Canon's AWB is no where near desire IMO, and in this case, the X1 AWB is extremely close to real life.

 

NR off and sharpening at about 75% for both.

 

IMG_0378.jpg

L1000112.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Leica prime can hardly be compared to a Canon zoom, 100% crops cannot be the same size due to different pixel count and the last 5D2 pic is misfocussed. Just redo it with more care and a Summicron or an Elmarit on your Canon and we will laugh a bit. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As I said, it's just for the heck of it so it all good to laugh :D The last one wasn't miss-focused, the AF point was at the top of the snow globe and it just showed the FF shallower DOF compares to APS-C... No post processing whatsoever except for matching the WB on the X1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...