photosandthelaw Posted January 27, 2010 Share #1 Posted January 27, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) These images were model based glam images using the Leica s2, 70mm lens, and natural light. http://albums.phanfare.com/4854406/4544773 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 27, 2010 Posted January 27, 2010 Hi photosandthelaw, Take a look here S2 Images. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rick_dykstra Posted January 29, 2010 Share #2 Posted January 29, 2010 Nice work if you can get it ... Nicely done Matt. Are you as happy with the camera as I'm imagining you are? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeitz Posted January 30, 2010 Share #3 Posted January 30, 2010 That cigarette is really attractive. Did she stink up your outfit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arminw Posted January 30, 2010 Share #4 Posted January 30, 2010 I guess it must have been fun using the S2 ... ? Congratulation !!! It's really hard to tell the difference of quality when the images are jpg compressed and so small , but I hope you're happy ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gentleman Villain Posted January 30, 2010 Share #5 Posted January 30, 2010 I guess it must have been fun using the S2 ... ? Congratulation !!! It's really hard to tell the difference of quality when the images are jpg compressed and so small , but I hope you're happy ? Resolution is just one aspect of image quality and it is also the most simple to understand. That's why resolution in terms of megapixels has been one of the key selling points for consumer photography gear. Anybody can see resolution, it doesn't take that much discernment on the part of the viewer to understand differences in resolution. However, there are other aspects of image quality that are sometimes more difficult to learn to see and sometimes take years of experience to discern. For example, the posted images contain a beautiful film-like depth of focus quality. This can be seen regardless of the file size or jpg compression and it's one of the aspects that makes the S2 files unique in comparison to competing digital camera systems (that are often loaded with behind the lens filtration) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
photosandthelaw Posted February 4, 2010 Author Share #6 Posted February 4, 2010 Resolution is just one aspect of image quality and it is also the most simple to understand. That's why resolution in terms of megapixels has been one of the key selling points for consumer photography gear. Anybody can see resolution, it doesn't take that much discernment on the part of the viewer to understand differences in resolution. However, there are other aspects of image quality that are sometimes more difficult to learn to see and sometimes take years of experience to discern. For example, the posted images contain a beautiful film-like depth of focus quality. This can be seen regardless of the file size or jpg compression and it's one of the aspects that makes the S2 files unique in comparison to competing digital camera systems (that are often loaded with behind the lens filtration) I agree. Images taken on the S2 DEFINITELY have a photographic/film look to them. Add in lenses that maximize the available light hitting the sensor without distortion... and it's a great set. Admittedly small jpgs don't show how amazing the resolution is - but who cares. If I wanted a print for my wall - I would use a high res file. ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.