Jump to content

My new M2 and 35 Summaron


jpattison

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

These are both made with the above Tele Elmarit 90, no wide open (probably 5,6); remember there is a Tele Elmarit 90 that is even lighter (225g): is the last version in black : lighter, but I think less robust, and some of them suffer a strange problem in the back lens.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bshubins,

 

take a look at this related thread..

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/45351-summaron-m-35mm-f-3-5-a-3.html

 

The 35 f3.5 with detachable goggles cannot be used without them, see item 44 in the above link.

 

The modification to these earlier 35s (with and without detachable goggles, M3 only) is to file a tiny section of one bayonet, to bring up the 35mm frame-lines on M2 and later bodies.

 

Regards,

John

 

Before the person who queried, nail files his lens, can you confirm this is accurate, logic says the goggled lenses don't need filing, but need googles.

 

Noel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest JoanMarianne

Advertisement (gone after registration)

There is something very intriguing about lenses from the Fifties, and earlier. When you use them you are recording the world in the way the first owners would have recorded it. not exactly looking into the past, as with the binoculars in the M R James ghost story "A View from a Hill", since time moves on; but at least part of the effect is there. Very romantic, I think......

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something very intriguing about lenses from the Fifties, and earlier. When you use them you are recording the world in the way the first owners would have recorded it. not exactly looking into the past, as with the binoculars in the M R James ghost story "A View from a Hill", since time moves on; but at least part of the effect is there. Very romantic, I think......

 

Interesting thought Joan. I hadn't thought about it in the light of James' story but now you come to mention it.... Lets hope Leica didn't use the same ingredients in their lenses then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...