luigi bertolotti Posted February 21, 2010 Share #21 Posted February 21, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) These are both made with the above Tele Elmarit 90, no wide open (probably 5,6); remember there is a Tele Elmarit 90 that is even lighter (225g): is the last version in black : lighter, but I think less robust, and some of them suffer a strange problem in the back lens. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/109865-my-new-m2-and-35-summaron/?do=findComment&comment=1233520'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 Hi luigi bertolotti, Take a look here My new M2 and 35 Summaron. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
christoph_d Posted February 21, 2010 Share #22 Posted February 21, 2010 Luigi, Thanks, C. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmas Posted February 21, 2010 Share #23 Posted February 21, 2010 Hi bshubins, take a look at this related thread.. http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/45351-summaron-m-35mm-f-3-5-a-3.html The 35 f3.5 with detachable goggles cannot be used without them, see item 44 in the above link. The modification to these earlier 35s (with and without detachable goggles, M3 only) is to file a tiny section of one bayonet, to bring up the 35mm frame-lines on M2 and later bodies. Regards, John Before the person who queried, nail files his lens, can you confirm this is accurate, logic says the goggled lenses don't need filing, but need googles. Noel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted February 21, 2010 Share #24 Posted February 21, 2010 Correct, the goggled lenses will bring up the 50mm framelines on any M, and the goggles convert the field of view to 35mm so DON'T file anything!!!!! You can't use a goggled lens without goggles as the focussing cam is set differently to the non goggled lenses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmas Posted February 22, 2010 Share #25 Posted February 22, 2010 Hi James Thanks, this is a real panog thread I've never seen some of this stuff before, gotta go and stroke my beaten up M3 now. Noel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiZZ Posted February 23, 2010 Share #26 Posted February 23, 2010 My baby. Apparently its the first version 35 'cron. Still haven't developed the film from it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoanMarianne Posted March 10, 2010 Share #27 Posted March 10, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) There is something very intriguing about lenses from the Fifties, and earlier. When you use them you are recording the world in the way the first owners would have recorded it. not exactly looking into the past, as with the binoculars in the M R James ghost story "A View from a Hill", since time moves on; but at least part of the effect is there. Very romantic, I think...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cocker Posted March 10, 2010 Share #28 Posted March 10, 2010 There is something very intriguing about lenses from the Fifties, and earlier. When you use them you are recording the world in the way the first owners would have recorded it. not exactly looking into the past, as with the binoculars in the M R James ghost story "A View from a Hill", since time moves on; but at least part of the effect is there. Very romantic, I think...... Interesting thought Joan. I hadn't thought about it in the light of James' story but now you come to mention it.... Lets hope Leica didn't use the same ingredients in their lenses then! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.